America’s Most Controversial Pols…and Their MoJo Covers

When it comes to our covers, we draw it like we see it.


By the time a politician appears on the cover of Mother Jones, our readers are if anything all-too-familiar with them; it’s our job to present them to you in ways that are surprising, enlightening, and hopefully apt. Over the years the rogue’s gallery of baby-kissers has included a confident-looking Ronald Reagan, a badly-beaten Bill Clinton, and a Hillary cover which didn’t actually depict the then-presidential candidate. Take a look and see whether we’ve included your favorite.

Jerry Brown, July 1976: This headline-free cover represents the young Mother Jones‘ feeling that despite his “symbolic words and phrases,” Jerry Brown, the then- (as well as now-) governor of California who was running in the 1976 Democratic presidential primaries, talked a much more progressive game than he walked. To create this image in pre-Photoshop days, the artist cut into his painting of Brown to reveal a second painting of Dwight D. Eisenhower underneath. The whole thing was then photographed.

Art Director: Louise Kollenbaum; Illustrator: Dugald Stermer

 

Ronald Reagan, September/October 1980: This cover of a wily Reagan accompanied a story called “President Reagan’s First Four Years,” written before the election that brought him to the Oval Office. Editor Jeffrey Klein followed the future President on the campaign trail and interviewed Reagan appointees, advisers, and foes to report, all too accurately as it turned out, what the next four years would bring.

Art Director: Louise Kollenbaum; Illustrator: Robert Grossman

 

Newt Gingrich, October 1989: Not so subtle, this one! By 1989, Gingrich had become “not only the second most powerful Republican in the House but its self-styled ethics czar as well,” according to the cover story, which recounted how he helped bring down the Democratic Speaker of the House Jim Wright with an inquiry into his speaking fees and book publishing arrangements. The article pointed out that Gingrich was involved in similar lapses, and quoted former aides ready to spill the beans.

Art Director: Kerry Tremain; Illustrator: Philip Burke

 

George H. W. Bush, July/August 1991: This collage used imagery from Picasso’s Guernica to help depict the violence that Bush’s War on Drugs did to the body politic. The cover also refers to a related story on the long-term effects of the Gulf War on the people of Iraq.

Art Director: Kerry Tremain; Illustrator: Melissa Grimes

 

Bill Clinton, November/December 1994: At a time when it seemed that the Clinton administration was being overwhelmed by the defeat of health care reform and the Whitewater and Paula Jones scandals, Mother Jones presented an image of a battered President Clinton, still with his dukes up. The issue carried advice from American writers, activists, and political figures on how he could get up off the mat.

Creative Director: Kerry Tremain; Illustrator: Daniel Lee.

 

George W. Bush, February 2003: This cover rather literally suggests the consequences of Bush’s foreign policy, described inside as “Strike first. Act alone. Ignore Consequences.”
 
Design Director: Jane Palecek; Illustrator: Tim O’Brien

 

Hillary Clinton, January/February 2007: Since this think piece by Jack Hitt was about the public’s perception of Hillary, rather than the candidate herself, the cover emphasizes the article’s framing by leaving the subject off entirely.

Creative Director: Susan Scandrett; Photographer: Robert Schlatter

 

George W. Bush, September/October 2008: This issue contained a powerful portfolio of stories enumerating the failures of the Bush years and suggested how the country might move forward. The president appears as the Wicked Witch of the West from The Wizard of Oz, just as she’s melting. Also featured: Dick Cheney as a winged monkey, Barack Obama working surprisingly well as Dorothy, and John McCain as the Cowardly Lion (to whom the Wizard said, “You’re confusing courage with wisdom.”)

Creative Director: Tim J Luddy; Illustrator: Tim O’Brien

 

Barack Obama, January/February 2009: A suggestion that we represent newly-elected President Obama as a traditional New Year’s baby led to the late J.C. Leyendecker, who originated that meme by drawing New Year’s babies for the Saturday Evening Post from 1908 to 1943. Our illustrator presented a smart update, depicting a tightrope-walking Obama, worriedly taking his next step in front of the traditional Post circle.

Creative Director: Tim J Luddy; Illustrator: Dale Stephanos

 

Sarah Palin, November/December 2010: The planning meeting for this cover was one of those times where somebody said an idea, and the only discussion that followed was who we would ask to illustrate it. In this case the idea was “Sarah Palin as The Fifty Foot Woman” and the artist was Zina Saunders. She had done a smart series of McCain/Palin illustrations for the 2008 campaign, combining a masterly painting style (which is actually entirely digital) with a take-no-prisoners attitude. She later created an animation of the fifty-foot-Palin reaching toward the viewer, which was the genesis of the animations that she still does for Mother Jones today.
 
Creative Director: Tim J Luddy; Illustrator: Zina Saunders
 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate