Is the Pentagon Planning to Inject Us With Super-Human Invincibility Juice?

<a href="http://www.fotopedia.com/items/flickr-4415954257">UNICEF/Shehzad Noorani</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Gentlemen, please start your military-Obamacare forced-vaccination conspiracy engines.

The mystical Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is soliciting proposals from really smart people “for the development of nucleic acid platforms capable of in vivo host production of a transient immune prophylaxis for adults.” Put simply, it appears the Defense Department’s brain trust wants an injectable form of blood plasma “that is universal, safe, adaptable, and scalable to protect the US population.” It would be capable of morphing inside the human body to protect soldiers and civilians alike from…from what, exactly? “[E]merging or uncharacterized threats.” It’s kind of like Star Wars for your immune system.

The proposal is part of DARPA’s Autonomous Diagnostics to Enable Prevention (ADEPT) program, whose previous ideas included a plan to let soldiers diagnose their own health in the field by placing a single hair or a drop of semen on a kind of portable smart card. The current plan, however, goes beyond diagnosis, to what the agency calls Therapeutics: Prophylactic Options to Environmental and Contagious Threats (PROTECT), by proposing passive immunization“passive” because it introduces special antibodies into the recipient that are meant to combat a specific biological threat. (They’re different from active immunizations, which stimulate your immune cells to produce antibodies in perpetuity—the sort of protection that one gets in, say, a smallpox vaccine.) 

Such protection is called “transient” because it lasts only as long as the outside antibodies persist in the recipient’s body. Babies, for example, are born with passive immunization against measles, mumps, and rubella, thanks to antibodies their mothers pass along to them in utero. But those antibodies fade after a year or so, which is when doctors recommend MMR vaccinations. In the past, travelers were often given a shot of gamma globulin (a mixture of antibodies to all sorts of things) to bolster their immune systems against hepatitis—that’s transient, too.

Here’s another example of a passive immunization in action:

Passive immunization is useful against a variety of diseases for which a cure is either unknown, hard to procure, or slow to work. For example, the proposal states (PDF):

[E]ven with current access to anti-malarial drugs, more days were lost among U.S. soldiers to malaria in endemic regions than to bullets throughout the entire 20th century. Another concern is the approximately 30 percent of newly deployed military personnel that encounter severe gastroenteritis or dysentery (traveler’s diarrhea) within a few weeks of arrival at post.

If the technology works out, it could “confer protection to a healthy adult for a period of time, suitable to a military mission requirement or in a public health setting,” whether for malaria and dysentery and other “diseases of high military priority”—but, as the solicitation states, “development of any transient immunity system targeting infectious diseases or toxins will be considered.”

DNA- and RNA-based injections to cure whatever? Steel yourself for some hardcore conspiracy theories. There’s already a robust fear of proven vaccines among the paranoid—both inside the military and out of it. Besides the infamous alleged autism-vaccine links, serious tinfoil hatters charge that inoculations are a government plot to control our behavior and monitor our movements.

Imagine the suspicions that might arise from a bunch of military-engineered temporary vaccines for a panoply of maladies, especially after the groundless allegations that the Affordable Care Act “will lead to mandatory vaccinations for everyone.” (“Over my dead body,” one Paulie writes about supposedly forced HPV vaccinations.)

Government black-ops fantasies aside, Mother Jones has reached out to some virologists and immunologists to dig a little deeper into DARPA’s aspirations. More to come.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate