December 11, 2012

Sen. Joe Manchin’s Lonely War on MTV’s Trashy “Buckwild”

<a href="http://manchin.senate.gov/public/">US Senate</a> ; MTV

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Joe Manchin III, the gun-toting Democratic junior senator from West Virginia who loves coal, is waging a one-man war against MTV’s upcoming reality show Buckwild.

In case you haven’t heard about Buckwild, it’s the show that intends to fill the void in your life left when Jersey Shore goes off the air in late December. Buckwild, premiering Thursday January 3, is an unforgiving cavalcade of cultural stereotypes. The easiest way to describe the show is Jersey Shore, but transposed to small-town West Virginia. The series follows a group of thickly-accented young adults as they swear, fight, carouse, and fornicate their early twenties away. Stars include “Justin Beaver,” one of the adrenaline-junkie males, and Shae, a blonde and “spicy” Southern belle who is sexually attracted to degenerates. The cast also enjoy shooting things, blowing stuff up, and operating all-terrain motor vehicles with zero regard for logic or safety.

So instead of exploiting debauched, club-raving Italian-Americans for the sake of ratings, this program will exploit hormonal, mud-wrestling West Virginians for the sake of hopefully comparable ratings.

Get More: BUCKWILD, Full Episodes

Sen. Manchin isn’t pleased with the above representation of his home state. And last Wednesday, he started tweeting about it. He began by addressing a piece posted to a satirical “fake news” website claiming that Manchin had singlehandedly vanquished Buckwild.

Manchin also wrote a letter on Friday, addressed to MTV president Stephen K. Friedman, requesting the immediate removal of Buckwild from the channel’s 2013 lineup:

senator joe manchin letter mtv

(MTV has yet to respond to the senator’s plea for cancelation.)

And here he is on The Today Show on Monday, railing against the pop-culture “travesty”:

For those as unfamiliar with Joe Manchin as they are with horny twentysomethings on MTV, he is the “centrist,” NRA-endorsed Democrat who won the November 2010 special election to replace the late Sen. Robert Byrd. He served as West Virginia’s governor from 2005 to 2010. He is an unabashed and loyal “friend of coal,” has sued the EPA over its efforts to regulate coal mining, and as governor named coal the official state rock of West Virginia. (Because it’s the state’s economic lifeblood, politicians in West Virginia tend to really like coal.)

Manchin is also notable for his vote against the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” his promises to fight health care reform, and for this campaign ad from October 2010, in which he quite literally blasts a whole through a cap-and-trade bill while pledging to “take on Washington and [the Obama] administration to get the federal government off of our backs and out of our pockets”:

With this ad, it’s almost as if Manchin created his own slice of reality television, presenting himself to voters as a butch, over-the-top West Virginian caricature. (Plus, with his penchant for shooting inanimate objects, he might actually fit in well with the kids of Buckwild better than he’d like to admit.)

At this point, the senator’s crusade against the forces of Buckwild seems like a bit of a lonely road. West Virginia’s Democratic governor Earl Ray Tomblin has yet to weigh in on the show. Neither has Manchin’s fellow West Virginia senator Jay Rockefeller (also a Democrat). The Mountain State’s House delegation (Shelley Moore Capito, David McKinley, and Nick Rahall) have also kept quiet.

This isn’t the first time Manchin has raged against on-screen depiction of his constituents. In 2008, he spoke out against a casting call for the Julianne Moore-starring horror flick Shelter, which sought an extra with “physical abnormalities” to depict West Virginia mountain folk. Representatives Capito and Rahall also issued their criticism of the production, and the movie’s casting director was soon canned.

But if MTV’s track record of offending politicians with their reality shows and making a lot of money anyway is any indication, it is probably safe to bet that Manchin won’t score a similar victory this time around. Furthermore, it’s worth noting that Jersey Shore faced far more political opposition prior to its premiere in 2009, and it still went on to set ratings records for MTV and leave its rowdy imprint on international pop-culture.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate