5 Albums to Get Excited About in 2013

Courtesy <a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151078871537687&set=pb.182490322686.-2207520000.1357536730&type=3&theater">Angel Haze</a>/Facebook

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

We survived the apocalypse, the fiscal cliff, and a new Ke$ha album. If the last bit of 2012 was gloom and doom, 2013, at least, may offer a musical respite. Here are five albums we can look forward to in the new year.

Yo La Tengo, Fade (January 15) In a world of one-hit wonders, quietly depressing reunion tours, and bands that put out a few great albums and then fall off the face of the planet, Yo La Tengo are the freak survivalists. Fade marks the trio’s 14th studio album—since 1986, they’ve showered a unique, consistent goodness on an adoring cult of fans. In November, YLT prereleased the Fade single “Before We Run,” a swelling, meditative lullaby sung in Georgia Hubley’s honest alto. More recently, the band put out “Ohm,” a gentle krautrocker with a chorus bound to glue itself to the inside of your skull. To celebrate the upcoming full-length, YLT has announced a series of West Coast in-record-store shows. (Check out the schedule here.)

Unknown Mortal Orchestra, II (February 5): Frontman Ruban Nielson has described this sophomore album as “lonely.” That’d be a major change of pace from the band’s debut, which clattered onto the scene in 2011 as a funky, exuberant patchwork of psych-pop songs—the stuff of surrealistic lyrics and deliciously weird, tart guitar lines recalling the earliest Pink Floyd. It’s been nearly two years since Nielson, former guitarist of New Zealand’s experimental noise outfit The Mint Chicks, let those first few tracks loose via Bandcamp, and I’m not the only one who’s been keeping a keen weather eye out for UMO’s next delivery. If “Swim and Sleep (Like a Shark),” a single from II, is anything by which to judge the release, Nielson’s second effort is shaping up to be just as inspired as the first. Loneliness, in this case, is welcome.

Angel Haze, Dirty Gold (date TBA): Putting aside the petty Twitter wars with Azealia Banks, 2013 is shaping up to be another stellar year for the young breakout rapper Angel Haze, who released three digital mixtapes in 2012. In October, Haze made headlines for her track “Cleanin’ Out My Closet” on her Classick mixtape, which unsparingly detailed her history of childhood sexual abuse. Here’s to hoping Dirty Gold, her major label debut due out this spring, builds on the reputation Haze has staked out as a performer who’s smart, hungry, and seriously skilled.

My Bloody Valentine Dirty Gold (date TBA): Although My Bloody Valentine’s followup to the 1991 classic Loveless is making every anticipated album listicle across the nation, no one’s really quite sure when it’s set to drop. In late December, the band announced on Facebook page that it had finished mastering the record, so it has to be somewhat soon, right? Guess all we can do in the meantime is constantly refresh the band’s website and listen to “Only Shallow” on repeat.

The Breeders, Last Splash Anniversary Reissue and Tour (April reissue, June shows): Forget that bit above about “quietly depressing” reunion tours, and apologies to the Yeah Yeah Yeahs, Nick Cave and the creator of any other exciting, upcoming 2013 album I might have included in this last spot. I know this isn’t a new record—it’s 20 years old, in fact—but the fact that Kim and Kelley Deal are putting together an anniversary tour for The Breeders’ Last Splash puts my immediate consideration of all those new albums on hold. Last week, a rehearsal video shot in Kim Deal’s basement of the album’s opening track, “New Year,” surfaced. New music? Yes, yes, in good time. For now, commence Last Splash relistening immediately.

Click here for more music coverage from Mother Jones.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate