Walmart Workers Get Organized—Just Don’t Say the U-Word

The labor movement has gained a toehold inside one of America’s most anti-union companies. Can it survive?

Outside the box: Black Friday shoppers and OUR Walmart protesters at a Walmart in Paramount, California last November. Nick Ut / AP Photo

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


At first, William Fletcher, a soul-patched, wisecracking 24-year-old who works in the electronics department at the Walmart in Duarte, California, couldn’t believe what the stranger with the clipboard standing outside his front door was telling him. The guy was describing a new group called Organization United for Respect at Walmart, which was recruiting employees like Fletcher to demand higher wages, better benefits, and less-punishing work schedules. Fletcher liked what he heard, but was skeptical. He’d recently settled a bitter dispute with management over a knee injury. “Frankly, I was convinced it was Walmart sending someone over to trick me into signing something to get me fired,” he says.

He told the guy he wasn’t interested, but another organizer came knocking the next day. This OUR Walmart thing must be real, Fletcher thought. He signed up but didn’t dare tell anyone, and for months the fear of being found out gnawed at him. And with good reason: Walmart strongly discourages the 1.4 million “associates” at its 4,601 US stores from organizing. The company has been known to shutter whole departments and even entire stores where unions make inroads. The result: The average associate earns $8.81 an hour, and many rely on food stamps and Medicaid.

Fletcher didn’t go public until June 2011, eight months after signing up, when he took time off from work to join 100 OUR Walmart members who traveled to Bentonville, Arkansas, to request a sit-down with company brass. Instead, they got to meet with a senior vice president of global labor relations in a parking lot. “It was terrifying,” Fletcher says. “I thought I’d be fired when I got back.”

He wasn’t, even though OUR Walmart has emerged as a major irritant to the big-box chain. On Black Friday last year, it helped organize protests at nearly 100 Walmart stores in 46 states. An estimated 500 associates walked off the job on the biggest shopping day of the year. Walmart, already facing allegations of bribery in Mexico and unsafe working conditions at its Asian suppliers, asked the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to block the protests, saying OUR Walmart was a union front. Store managers received a confidential memo (PDF) on dealing with restive employees (talking point: “I don’t think a walkout is a good way to resolve problems or issues, especially because it interferes with customer service and other associates who want to work”). A company spokesman said on national TV that if workers didn’t show up on Black Friday, “there could be consequences.”

If OUR Walmart members keep their jobs, it may suggest that the next best thing to a union might survive within one of America’s most anti-labor corporations.

Under federal law, companies may not fire workers for organizing unions, but those who walk off or launch other disruptive actions may be fired. Yet so far, there have been no reports of OUR Walmart members being sacked for walking out, and the group has claimed Black Friday as a major victory. “It was outstanding,” says Mary Pat Tifft, who’s spent 25 years at store No. 1167 in Kenosha, Wisconsin. She joined OUR Walmart in 2011 and, like Fletcher, hid her involvement for months. But once she let people know, she says, “It’s almost like you get this huge weight off your shoulders.”

As for the union front claim, Walmart’s got a point: OUR Walmart was established by the United Food and Commercial Workers union, though UFCW officials insist it’s not a steppingstone for unionizing. In late January, UFCW pledged to the NLRB that it would not try to unionize Walmart workers and would ease up on picketing for 60 days. As a result, the labor board says it will dismiss Walmart’s complaint alleging that OUR Walmart’s Black Friday protests were illegal. OUR Walmart wants the same things a real union wants, but it is not a union. It can’t bargain with management or bring grievances on behalf of workers. But it is a new toehold for the union, which has tried and failed to organize Walmart workers for a decade. In 2005, it started a short-lived group called Wake Up Walmart and tried its hand at informal organizing with Walmart Workers of America, a precursor to OUR Walmart. Both efforts went nowhere. Pat O’Neill, UFCW’s organizing director, says OUR Walmart offers workers a new way to speak out. “Instead of turning workers away,” he explains, “we’re saying, ‘Here’s an organization you can form or join and band together with fellow workers.'”

OUR Walmart is a promising model for national labor organizing at a time when unions are under siege, says Nelson Lichtenstein, a labor historian at the University of California-Santa Barbara. It provides a playbook for workers itching to improve conditions at corporations like Marriott or Whole Foods that have managed to beat back actual unions time and again. Nonunion unions also may give workers a voice in states where lawmakers have kneecapped organized labor with right-to-work laws and curbs on collective bargaining. The test, Lichtenstein adds, is whether OUR Walmart members keep their jobs. If they do, it may signal that Walmart isn’t spoiling for a public fight, suggesting that the next best thing to a union might survive within one of America’s most anti-union corporations.

Tifft isn’t waiting around to find out if her job is safe. In the past two years, she’s gone from a quiet stockroom receiver to one of OUR Walmart’s most vocal champions. She now hopes to recruit new members as an organizer. “I don’t have as much to lose,” she says. “I’m not the single mom that’s dependent on this job. If it takes me getting out there to speak for them until they find their voice, then that’s what I’ll do.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate