Ziggy It Ain’t, but David Bowie’s Latest Ain’t Bad, Either

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


David Bowie
The Next Day
RCA

If you are a person who listens to music, I have to imagine your reaction to the news that David Bowie would be releasing his first new album in a decade was something along the lines of “OMG! OMG! OMG!” with strong undertones of “Oh God, please let it be decent enough not to retroactively ruin Ziggy Stardust.”

The British rock legend faces the classic predicament of artists described as such: how to continue a creative career when everyone secretly just wants to see you back in face paint and six-inch platforms? (Okay, maybe that’s just a predicament of being David Bowie.) To his credit, he hasn’t shied away from the challenge, but rather confronted it head-on with an album title and cover that hint, not too subtly: “Let’s move on.”

The album itself passes the test, if not quite with flying colors: The Next Day doesn’t wow at first listen, but it’s a solid contribution that doesn’t feel out of place with Bowie’s eclectic body of work. The album opens with the title track, an up-tempo, reasonably catchy rocker that has Bowie singing “they can’t get enough of that doomsday song”—a line that for anyone else would amount to jumping on the apocalypse bandwagon, but for Bowie, who was into dystopia before it was cool, marks a return to old themes. Likewise with the slow swagger of “Dirty Boys,” which finds Bowie dreaming of smashing windows and running around town. On “Where Are We Now,” where Bowie waxes nostalgic for Berlin in the ’70s, there’s an obvious potential for things to get horribly banal or unbearably sentimental, but he manages to pull off a subdued, elegiac track that highlights his still-expressive voice. 

The Next Day

Several songs are strong in parts but don’t quite come together. “If You Can See Me” is a dose of weirder Bowie featuring a strangely offbeat, uneven rhythm overlaid with anxious, borderline paranoid vocals. “I’d Rather Be High” starts off sunnily upbeat but turns out, in a jarringly strange shift, to be an anti-war song of sorts, with Bowie singing “I’d rather be dead/Or out of my head/Than training these guns/On the men in the sand.” On “Boss of Me,” Bowie seems to be attempting to channel Springsteen with notes of sax amidst guitars and yearnings for a “small-town girl,” but he can’t quite pull it off. He’s better in more familiar territory with “Dancing in Space,” a charmingly light tune with a zig-zagging guitar, and “(You Will) Set the World on Fire,” an appropriately spirited rocker. 

But let no one say Bowie has gotten sentimental in his golden years; many of the songs are darkly foreboding. Yes, there’s a song called “Valentine’s Day,” but the lyrics speak of a “scrawny hand” and “icy heart.” And it gets bleaker: “I can see you as a corpse hanging from a beam,” he sings on the powerful “You Feel So Lonely You Could Die,” while on grim closer “Heat,” he sings of his father who “ran the prison”—”I can only love you by hating him more.”

Also read: “What Does a Bowie Cover Band Think of the New Bowie Album?

Click here for more music coverage from Mother Jones.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate