Josh Ritter Releases the Cheeriest Breakup Album Ever

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Josh Ritter
The Beast in its Tracks
Pytheas Recordings

When one of the best living songwriters gets divorced, it’s hard to know what to expect: Josh Ritter isn’t one for “angry, over-the-top, knee-jerk breakup songs,” as NPR puts it, but The Beast in its Tracks, out this week, is such a clean, joyful trip across the Americana landscape that you’d be forgiven for thinking that Ritter just got hitched to a new bride, wearing tweed. It’s a little deceiving—like if your best friend got dumped, showed up to your birthday party insisting that everything was just peachy, God damn it, and then wandered off into the woods with a handle of whiskey.

Don’t let that stop you from acquiring the album when it comes out on Tuesday. (NPR is streaming it in full, but don’t be lame; artists need to eat, too.) Ritter’s album convincingly recalls everyone from Bob Dylan to Bruce Springsteen to Paul Simon, and I already have at least three favorite songs looping on my stereo (“A Certain Light,” “New Lover,” and “Hopeful”).

Beast has much more in common with Ritter’s last EP, the stripped-down Bringing in the Darlings, than with his experimental full-length, So Runs the World Away, which was dominated by members of the terrific Royal City Band, Ritter’s backing band. The new album is all about lo-fi sound, driving guitar, and Ritter’s voice, with the occasional giddy instrumentation bursting through—such as the shaker-like percussion on “In Your Arms Awhile” or the haunting domestic kitchen sounds in “Appleblossom Rag.” 

Ritter’s run-on lyrics fly off the page—as if he’s singing his feelings as he experiences them: “How many times did the truth that you take to be true, just truth falling apart at the same speed as you?” There’s not a clear relationship trajectory here; a “new lover” makes an appearance several times throughout the album, interspersed with longings and memories of a spouse. But despite the stream of consciousness, his songs have a heavy dose of distance and reflection: It’s all about the part of a breakup where you’re firmly on your way toward wishing your old lover well, smiling fondly about the good times, and hey, still throwing in a bitter jab or two when it suits you—”New Lover.”

But that’s the thing: Divorce sucks. My favorite breakup album of all time, The First Days of Spring by Noah and the Whale, wasn’t afraid to devastate the listener. It documented everything from 4 a.m. phone calls to the horror of sleeping with a stranger after a long-term relationship. And even Frightened Rabbit’s Pedestrian Verse, which came out last month, understood that when discussing this subject, it’s necessary to employ the word “fuck.” As a listener, I probably have no right to this kind of musical voyeurism, but if one of my favorite singers is writing about heartache, it’s hard not to demand it. 

So my short take: Listen to The Beast in its Tracks if you need a beautiful album for a cross-country road trip with your new lover. But listen to Ritter’s 2007 throwback, “The Temptation of Adam,” if you’re all alone, and know that you’ll never, ever get over the old one. 

?

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate