Are You Ready for the Coming of the Drones?

“We are not darkening the skies yet,” says executive at SoCal civilian drones conference, “but we are poised.”

The Fire Scout unmanned copterNorthrup Grumman

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Defense cuts have forced commanders at Southern California’s Naval Base Ventura County to idle planes and cancel troop deployments, but you’d never know it from looking at nearby defense contractor Northrup Grumman: Its stock price has risen 9 percent in less than a month, buoyed by brisk sales of drones such as the Fire Scout unmanned helicopter, which will be deployed at the base this summer.

Indeed, lean times in the public sector appear to be helping drone manufacturers, as they pitch unmanned aircraft as cheaper replacements for a wide range of activities involving human labor and/or dangerous conditions. “We can capitalize on this budget-constrained environment to keep this development going,” explained Janis Pamiljans, Northrup Grumman’s head of unmanned air systems. 

Pamiljans was addressing a who’s who of manufacturers, hobbyists, and public officials who showed up at the naval base last week during a conference on civilian applications of drones (the industry calls them “unmanned aerial vehicles”), which could constitute a $90 billion market within a decade—or so says the industry’s trade group, the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI). “We are not darkening the skies yet,” said Richard Christiansen, the vice-president of the NASA contractor Sierra Lobo Inc., “but we are poised.”

While the military has infamously used drones for overseas surveillance and lighting up terrorism suspects (and civilians), it’s also increasingly relying on them for more prosaic tasks such as cargo transport. Civilian police, fire, and agriculture authorities, meanwhile, see uses for small drones that can operate at a fraction of the cost of manned helicopters. Drones have been proposed or used for chasing storms, spying on wildlife poachers, monitoring deforestation, going into places inhospitable to humans (think Fukushima)—and even news reporting. “I submit to you that as we get more comfortable with this technology, it’s going to be economics that drives how they play,” said Mike Francis, the chief of advanced programs for the United Technologies Research Center, which is developing a drone for use by first responders.

The invention of drones is “akin to the advent of the jet engine. This is going to change the face of how the FAA manages aviation.”

One of the biggest winners from the coming drones boom could be Southern California’s beleaguered aerospace industry; boosters say the technology could do for SoCal what the internet did for Silicon Valley. The state has by far the nation’s largest concentration of drone manufacturing, including small but fast-growing outfits such as Aerovironment, AirStar International, and 3D Robotics that sell to local governments, film crews, and hobbyists. Manufacturers and local politicians recently formed the Southern California Unmanned Systems Alliance to push the Federal Aviation Administration to establish one of six new test sites for commercial drones at the Ventura County base.

“The more programs you can have assigned to your facility, the more likely you are to survive” base closures, said base commander Capt. Vance Vasquez. The base already operates what may be the world’s largest drone, a remote-controlled 563-foot-long destroyer ship that tests self-defense weaponry against live missiles fired from shore. Of the base’s new Fire Scout unmanned helicopter, Vasquez said: “It may replace all manned aviation at some point.”

And then some. Congress recently ordered the FAA to figure out how to incorporate drones into commercial airspace, setting the stage for the day when drones might be used to deliver pizzas or track Lindsay Lohan’s every public movement. FAA assistant division manager Keith Ballenger told conference attendees that the invention of drones is “akin to the advent of the jet engine. This is going to change the face of how the FAA manages aviation.”

Young people “don’t know privacy, because they’ve never had it. So we could just wait this thing out!”

But while California is on the cutting edge, it’s also leading the backlash. On Tuesday, protesters gathered outside a conference hotel to demonstrate against the involvement of politicians such as Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, who was a no-show despite his billing as a cosponsor. “ICYMI, the politicians who seem like they want to protect your privacy against drones really do not care about your privacy at all,” read one tweet by the California privacy group NOMBY (Not Over My Backyard).

The drone industry acknowledges that privacy concerns are its single biggest obstacle. At the conference, AUVSI president Mike Toscano showed a photograph of his toddler grandson on an iPad. “These [young] people know connectivity,” he said. “They don’t know privacy, because they’ve never had it. So we could just wait this thing out!” Everyone laughed. The crowd didn’t figure commercializing drones will take nearly that long.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate