LISTEN: Here Is a Song About the Twitter Feud Between Paul Krugman and the President of Estonia

A night at the opera, President Ilves (left) and Paul Krugman.PhotoXpress/ZUMA Press (left) ; Mister Shadow/Agencia Estado/ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


There is a new European musical production, sung and performed in soaring operatic style, that tells the true story of the June internet war between Paul Krugman, the noted Keynesian economist, and Toomas Hendrik Ilves, the president of Estonia. The first shot rang out when Krugman published a blog post titled “Estonian Rhapsody” criticizing the Baltic state’s austerity measures. Later that day, Ilves, a national figurehead who commands no real executive power, retaliated by opening up a salvo of indignant and sometimes vulgar tweets, decrying Krugman as ignorant, “smug, overbearing & patronizing.”

Toomas Hendrik Ilves shit Krugman tweet

@IlvesToomas/Twitter

Naturally, someone would have to see this and think of it as musical-theater gold: “I couldn’t avoid the tweets,” Scott Diel, an Estonia-based American writer and lyricist for the show, tells me. “They just sort of recommended themselves.”

This is not the Onion. It’s the true story behind an original production that debuted Sunday night to a packed house at the historic House of the Brotherhood of Black Heads in Tallinn, Estonia, as part of the Estonian Music Days festival. A subsequent performance is in the works for the Estonia business conference Pärnu Konverentsid in the fall, and for a performance by Sinfonietta Riga in Latvia on October 18. The piece, titled Nostra Culpa, which means “our fault” in Latin (the expression was used in one of Ilves’ angry and sarcastic tweets), isn’t satirical, does not stake out a partisan position, and is not particularly critical of either Krugman or Ilves.

When news first broke in January that a musical showcase based on the semi-epic Krugman-Ilves feud was brewing, the production quickly made headlines, virtually all of which heralded a quirky, offbeat new “opera.” But the work isn’t actually an opera; it’s a cantata constructed as two movements. “The piece is angular; it’s quite destructive,” says Eugene Birman, the show’s Latvian composer, who studied economics at Columbia University and music at the Juilliard School. “The music in the first movement doubles as a representation of the shattering of the world during the [2008] financial crisis.”

Diel first approached Birman with the concept months ago. The Krugman-Ilves spat had left a lasting impression on Estonian pop culture, and was fresh in Diel’s mind—right around the time Birman was granted a commission to create a short operatic piece for the Estonian Music Days festival. “I asked Eugene, who I knew had a big enough sense of humor to take on this topic,” Diel says. “I knew he had previously written an opera about an ATM machine—a work performed in France. So I asked him, ‘What about a libretto based on the austerity/stimulus disagreement?'”

The lyrics in the first movement of Nostra Culpa paraphrase Krugman’s blog post, while the second movement quotes Ilves’ Twitter feed almost verbatim. The 16-minute piece was conceived as a one-woman show; both characters—Ilves and Krugman—are played by female Estonian singer Iris Oja. (Krugman and the president of Estonia did not respond to requests for comment.) And though both men were invited to the premiere, according to Diel, neither was in attendance (however, Birman tells me that Ilves’ son and the American ambassador to Estonia were in the audience). “[If Ilves and Krugman had both shown up], I wouldn’t know how to seat them,” Birman says. “Would they need to be far apart, or would I seat them together for some reconciliation.”

And in case you weren’t actually able to make it to Estonia for the premiere, here’s a recording of the performance that Birman provided to Mother Jones:

And here’s an sound clip of a rehearsal last week with the orchestra, conductor Risto Joost, Oja, and Birman and Diel. This excerpt is from the second movement of Nostra Culpa:

And here’s the full set of lyrics for both movements, also provided to Mother Jones by Birman:

Nostra Culpa

I. 

Economic triumph?
A natural experiment
Wonders of austerity
Economic triumph?

 

Poster child?
Incomplete recovery

 

Stimulate!
Estonian rhapsody
Austerians
Stimulate!

 

Fiscal stimulus trumps
Increased public debt
Devalue!

 

II.

Austerity in the wasteland
Dumb & silly East Europeans
Unenlightened
Nostra culpa

 

Frozen pensions
Lowered salaries
Internal devaluation
Nostra culpa

 

Gray apartments
Just wogs
Someday will understand
Nostra culpa

 

smug, overbearing & patronizing
Sh*t on East Europeans
Chill
Nostra culpa

 

In a world where professional composers are now writing operas on subjects like the life of deceased Playboy centerfold Anna Nicole Smith, the source material for Nostra Culpa might still seem unorthodox—and oddly specific—to the casual observer. But the show’s creators insist that their chosen subject matter was never a gimmick; in fact, they view “Krugman Vs. Ilves” as perfectly suited for a full-on operatic treatment: “Nobody I know looks to Twitter and thinks they’re going to scour [millions of Tweets] and find something really beautiful,” Birman says. “But the truth is that Twitter can have world-changing implications. And when writing an opera or cantata, nowhere is it written that your work must be based on high poetry or classical literature.”

And depending on how well Nostra Culpa is received, Birman and Diel claim they might expand the piece into a full-length, three-hour opera focusing on various facets of global financial meltdown; the Krugman/Ilves skirmish would merely be one chapter in a broader musical odyssey. “There is so much material out there: HSBC, Davos, government regulators, Iceland, ratings agencies—and even Nobel Laureate economists and small country presidents,” Diel says. “Perhaps I’d want to create a lizard overlord banker character…There are many ways we could have fun writing—and singing—about financial crisis.”

UPDATE (7:35 p.m. ET, 4/8/2013): Click here for footage of the Sunday performance.

Headshot photo credit: Kaupo Kikkas


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate