Ken Cuccinelli Scrubs His Immigration Hardliner Past

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ken_Cuccinelli_by_Gage_Skidmore_3.jpg">Gage Skidmore</a>/Wikimedia Commons

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As a member of the Virginia Senate, GOP gubernatorial nominee Ken Cuccinelli used his email newsletter to tout his role in founding State Legislators for Legal Immigration (SLLI), a group dedicated to cutting off economic, education, and employment opportunities to undocumented immigrants. Cuccinelli, who is now the state’s attorney general, has softened his views in recent months to appeal to a broader audience as he runs for governor. But as a potential swing-state governor, his past statements clash with the Republican National Committee’s post-election autopsy stressing the importance of immigration reform for the future of the party.

SLLI was launched in 2007 by Pennsylvania state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, a Republican. The group aligned itself with anti-immigration hardliners in an effort to convince the Supreme Court to use the 14th Amendment to end birthright citizenship—a position Cuccinelli endorsed in a Senate resolution urging Congress to take action against what he called “anchor babies.” According to its mission statement, the group also aims “to provide a network of state legislators who are committed to working together in demanding full cooperation among our federal, state and local governments in eliminating all economic attractions and incentives (including, but not limited to: public benefits, welfare, education and employment opportunities) for illegal aliens, as well as securing our borders against unlawful invasion.”

In May 2007, Cuccinelli endorsed SLLI in his newsletter, the Cuccinelli Compass, writing, “I was one of the founding members of State Legislators for Legal Immigration.” He spelled out a version of the group’s mission statement, expressing the importance of eliminating incentives that “continue to lure illegal aliens across the border,” and wrote that he supported sending “illegal aliens back to their home country.” He also wrote, “You can count on me to remain vigilant on this issue!” Cuccinelli sent out the newsletter days after stating in an SLLI press release that “[p]orous borders and lax immigration enforcement have left us vulnerable not only to terrorist attacks but to increasing levels of crime in our communities,” specifically those who “traffic their deadly cocktail of drugs and gang violence into Virginia.” (Read the full text of the email’s immigration section below.)

In 2012, Latino voters represented just 5 percent of the vote in Virginia, so it’s unclear how much of an effect Cuccinelli’s immigration views will have on the race for governor. But the majority of Virginians support immigration reform to some degree. And Cuccinelli’s opponent, Democrat Terry McAuliffe, has hit Cuccinelli on his immigration rhetoric while endorsing the Virginia DREAM Act, which would allow children of undocumented immigrants to pay in-state tuition at public universities. But in a 2007 interview, McAulifee took a harder stance against immigrants “who have been here illegally and have taken advantage of the situation,” supporting “a plan to get them back to the countries they came from” and “shut these borders down.”

More recently, Cuccinelli has backed off his hardline rhetoric. In March, the Washington Post noted that Cuccinelli had scrubbed an immigration issues page from his website that had been online as recently as last November, eights months after he filed paperwork to run for governor. The page highlighted his opposition to in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants and his support for a voter ID law. It also noted his role in passing legislation to require state contractors to run background checks verifying employees’ legal status and to grant local authorities the power to investigate houses thought to be boarding undocumented immigrants. (A cached version of the page is still online.)

Lately, Cuccinelli has tailored his statements on immigration depending on his audience, but has continued to keep his rhetoric toned down. In his first debate with McAuliffe in July, he said, “I want very much to see some sort of compromise reached in the area of immigration…so that we could move on to other issues,” and declined to take a position on a path to citizenship for the nation’s 11 million undocumented immigrants. But at a town hall two days later, Cuccinelli said he supported a bill “where everybody knows the rules and what they’re going to be and does it without amnesty, so we don’t repeat the 1986 problem again.” (The 1986 immigration reform law gave undocumented immigrants a path to citizenship while failing to halt further illegal immigration.) He has also voiced support for President Barack Obama’s record number of deportations of undocumented immigrants.

Meanwhile, SSLI continues to breathe fire. Metcalfe, for example, has voiced strong opposition to the Senate immigration reform bill, denouncing it as “amnesty” for “illegal aliens” and “out-of-touch with reality, a dereliction of duty and nothing short of a fiscal disaster for the states” that would jack up taxes on American citizens. Metcalfe did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A spokeswoman for Cuccinelli’s gubernatorial campaign did not respond to a request for comment about the candidate’s current opinion of the group.

The Cuccinelli Compass section on immigration from May 25, 2007:

Cuccinelli Compass May 25, 2007

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate