A Gorgeous Video of a Devastating Fire in Colorado

The 2013 West Fork Complex wildfire seen from Lake Alberta in Colorado.<a href="http://whoismatt.com/wp-content/gallery/pagosa-timelapse/lake-alberta-wildfire.jpg">Matt Johnson</a>


This story first appeared on the Slate website and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

Over and again, I am struck by the paradox of the beauty inherent in some terror. Usually, this comes in the form of weather. Hurricanes from space are stately and serene, completely belying the destruction below. A mesocyclone swirls, dark and foreboding and gorgeous, over a Texas plain. Rapidly-forming storm-cells create tornadoes which devastate Oklahoma, but are delicate and soft when seen from space.

Wildfires aren’t exactly weather, but they are related, and certainly fall into this category of terrifying yet still distressingly beautiful. This summer, my home state of Colorado suffered the most destructive fire in its history. Oddly, the number and acreage of the fires haven’t broken records, but the locations are key; two lives were lost in the Black Forest fire, and the property damage was historic.

Photographer Matt Johnson traveled to Colorado in June 2013 and shot time-lapse footage of the West Fork Complex Fires, another wildfire which was triggered by lightning and eventually burned over 100,000 acres. The video he created is both stunningly gorgeous and viscerally horrifying.

The first hint of the fires is in the opening shots; the distant clouds are lovely, but some are slightly discolored. Having seen many fires in this area, I recognized the reddish tint to the clouds, and the hint of brown around the edges. At the 1:14 mark the shot is lovely, by the clouds on the extreme left are darker, more ominous. Then, at 1:56, the shots at night make it clear what you’re seeing.

A pyrocumulus clouds created by the wildfire. Matt Johnson

At 2:20, a long shot of the mountains and fire are amazing. When trees burn, they give off dark smoke, of course, but also the water in the vegetation becomes steam, rising as white clouds. Together, they form the main plumes seen, rising violently due to the extreme heat of the fire (the technical term is convection, where hot air rises and cool air sinks). This creates what’s called a pyrocumulus cloud; a cauliflower-like cloud usually associated with rain and thunderstorms. In this case, the rising column of smoke and steam also lifts up and compresses the air above it, which can cause water vapor to condense and form temporary pileus clouds, with curved hoods and streamers like cloudy caps.

These fires were also seen from space:

The West Fork Complex fire seen from the International Space Station. NASA

That’s a picture taken by an astronaut on the International Space Station from June 19, 2013. Again, it’s menacing yet mesmerizing.

The rash of fires we’ve been experiencing over the years has multiple causes. Part is due to the multi-year drought we’ve been suffering though, and part due to a surplus of wildfire-fueling undergrowth that hasn’t been cleared out by smaller, natural fires (we tend to put out those fires, ironically, to prevent them from growing). But another source is global warming: The drought may be due to this, but over the years summers have started earlier and lasted longer. Bark beetle populations have soared because their breeding season has lasted longer, giving them more time to complete their life cycles, and milder winters have somewhat mitigated the usual cold-weather die-offs. The number of insect-killed trees I’ve seen in the Rockies has been troubling. Over at Climate Central, Andrew Freedman has a lot more detail about this.

Some people scoff that humans can have an affect on this great big world of ours. These people have their eyes tightly screwed shut. I wonder if the eerie beauty of videos like this one of the Colorado fires will help; looking in the face of raw ugliness is hard and can make it harder to accept the truth, but when it’s wrapped in such compelling footage, perhaps it’s easier to understand the unsettling reality of what’s happening.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate