Is Climate Change Pushing Pests into Northern Farms?

Pine beetles like this aren't the only pests driven north by climate change. <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/sfupamr/8622810548/sizes/c/in/photolist-e8Yaao-9MdtSr-9MdueV-9MdvQF-9MggqJ-9MgewL-9Mdwhi-9Mdr7Z-9MghJ7-9Mgfmy-9Mdv6n-9MgfGd-9MgdN5-9Mgf2U-9Mdt24-8o6XQu-8znv5f-244wgb-do4c4v-6CjFMp-8A8sTa-m8Mqg-4h91wm-hqdut-hqdr3-hqdxu-hqdBA-5uw44t-6LkhGx-jQCMv-6o9nzQ-dqXznR-5uAr8u-hhsVY-9Cp3KK-9Cp31c-dqXJHN-2sFgf3-8gLqPt-5eRV5C-juLXd-8pWKE2-4bFnyX-sarY8-5ZPTVt-5ZPTMv-5ZPTF8-zwK4g-aqNwfu-coEYto-85GUkn/">SFU Public Affairs and Media Relations</a>/Flickr


In 1996 Colorado received a very unwelcome—and hungry—house guest, the mountain pine beetle, whose voracious appetite for pine has since killed off millions of acres of trees there. A few years later, the beetles came knocking in British Columbia and have now knocked out over half the province’s pine timber. The full-bore invasion of these critters, each no bigger than a grain of rice, is now one of the most pressing ecological disasters in the West, and their spread, scientists believe, is driven by climate change.

The beetles aren’t alone: Rising equatorial temperatures have pushed a menagerie of pests north at an alarming rate of nearly 10,000 feet every year since 1960, according to a new survey out today in Nature. Researchers led by biologist Dan Bebber at the UK’s University of Exeter combed through databases hosted by the non-profit CABI, which aggregates scientific and trade literature on agriculture, for the first documented appearance of over 600 kinds of pests (including insects, fungi, viruses, and bacteria), over a 50-year period in the Northern Hemisphere. They found, averaged across 14 taxonomic groups, a distinctive northward migration, wherein species first noticed at southern latitudes were, at a later date, discovered anew at northern latitudes. 

The chart below, from the paper, shows the distribution range of the different pest groups Bebber examined, with the vertical axis indicating distance from the equator (positive distances indicate north; negative distances indicate south) and the horizontal axis indicating time, from 1960 to the present. Overall, the groups show a gradual northward migration over time (up and to the right):

pest distribution chart

Bebber et al.

Climate change has previously been linked to the movement of other pest species, including butterflies (strange to imagine these as “pests,” but the larvae of their taxonomic order, Lepidoptera, wreak more havoc on crops and trees than any other group of insects) and avian flu, but Bebber says his analysis is the first to show a “significant shift” across many kinds of pests. For many of these creepy critters, weather conditions can be decisive in how deep they dig in; pine beetles locked onto Colorado primarily because winters, when many of them historically froze to death, had warmed enough for a larger chunk of the population to survive into the following year.

The trend Bebber identified should sound alarm bells for farmers and the agriculture industry in northern-latitude countries, he said—bells already sounded by pine beetles in Colorado and British Columbia. Earlier studies have shown that pests already destroy over 10 percent of the global harvest; that number could rise if higher temperatures push more pests into valuable breadbaskets like the US Corn Belt or Russia’s wheat fields.

Of course, pests are also spread for reasons having nothing to do with climate change, principally via human-caused contamination: Hitching a ride on a shipment of livestock or produce, for example, or international trade in live plants; Bebber says more research needs to be done to determine exactly what role climate change plays in this northward migration.

Also, Bebber cautions that before all northern countries begin to seek shelter from a Biblical plague, his study shows that more detailed pest tracking is needed, especially in poorer equatorial states that traditionally spend less money on formal monitoring, to give detailed advance notice to countries that could begin to see new pests.

“Our data on global distributions of many pests and pathogens is poor,” he said. “We need a better effort to describe what’s there, what’s emerging, and what’s coming out next.”

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate