Navy Yard Gunman’s Employer: Our Background Check Only Found a “Minor Traffic Violation”

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Following Aaron Alexis’ Navy Yard shooting spree on Monday, during which he reportedly killed 12 people, media reports have noted that the 34-year-old had several previous run-ins with the law, including two arrests for firearms violations. But the government subcontractor that employed Alexis to do IT work, The Experts Inc., says it ran two background checks on Alexis—one as recently as June—and they turned up nothing more than a traffic ticket.

“The suspect had been employed by The Experts for approximately six months over the last year, during which time we enlisted a service to perform two background checks and we confirmed twice through the Department of Defense his Secret government clearance,” Lou Colasuonno, a spokesman for The Experts Inc., tells Mother Jones in an email. “The latest background check and security clearance confirmation were in late June of 2013 and revealed no issues other than one minor traffic violation.”

Colasuonno did not respond to an inquiry asking which service his company had used to conduct the background checks. But evidence of Alexis’ possible criminal record was not hard to come by. A cursory internet search reveals that the former Navy reservist was arrested in 2010 for a firearms violation in Fort Worth, Texas, after he fired a gun into his downstairs neighbor’s apartment. A mug shot from that arrest was on the internet and indicated that Alexis had been cited for a firearms violation. He was also charged with shooting out the tires of a car in Seattle in 2004, during what he called an anger-fueled blackout (The outcome of the case is unclear.) According to the Navy, Alexis was cited at least eight times for misconduct during his time in the military.

The Navy has not issued any statements regarding the investigations it conducted related to Alexis’ security clearance. The Experts, founded in 1998, provides IT, engineering, and telecom services to Fortune 500 companies and the federal government. The company has a subcontract with Hewlett Packard to provide IT services to the Navy and Marine Corps, which Alexis had been assigned to.

Jon Nichols, a former contractor for The Experts who is now an intelligence analyst for a tech firm in New York City, tells Mother Jones he performed an IT job similar to the one that Alexis had with the company. It entailed flying out weekly to one of dozens of military bases in the United States and abroad to perform basic computer upgrades.

“People don’t need to be technically sophisticated to do that job,” he says. “They need to have a security clearance, and they need to have the ability to follow simple commands. I don’t think it’s The Experts’ fault for hiring someone to do a menial task, and not doing a deep background check when that person already had a government security clearance. They did their due diligence. But it looks like whoever did that security clearance missed doing a basic Google search.” 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate