The Darkside of Electronic-Music Producer Nicolas Jaar

Nicolas Jaar, left, and Dave Harrington are Darkside.Tim Jones/Shore Fire Media

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When I called up electronic-music producer Nicolas Jaar, the 24-year-old wunderkind was walking the streets of New York—briskly, judging by the pace of his breathing. He rapped ecstatic about his new project, Darkside, a collaboration with his old Brown classmate Dave Harrington. The two of them are touring now to showcase their debut album, Psychic—the shows in Paris and Berlin have already sold out months in advance.

Jaar says Psychic is the antithesis of his first album, Space is Only Noise, which he calls a “pure” and “ethereal” effort to “imbue a lot of love and honesty into my music that I felt was lacking around me.” So what happened after that idealistic and critically praised project that made him feel compelled to compose its antithesis?

“Snow is not always white,” he replies, deploying the first of several such metaphors he used during our conversation—New York had just been hit by snowstorm Hercules. “It’s really dirty in New York right now and it looks like shit.” That’s part of what Psychic is about: “The dark side of all these idealistic ideas is that they have to be sold,” he says. “And as much love as you try to put into something, it instantly goes into the chain of capitalism, and that’s just kind of gross. It’s kind of dirty. It’s the same thing as the snow, right?”

Listening to older interviews, one might get the impression that Jaar is brooding and pretentious. Raised in an intellectual, artistic home (his father is an architect and filmmaker, his mother a dancer), Nico spent six years in Santiago de Chile before moving back to his native New York. After graduating from Brown, where he wrote a comparative literature thesis on Faulkner and Derrida, he launched his own music label because he didn’t want other people to get their hands on his music. He once improvised a five hour jam at the MoMA PS1, under the vaulted geodesic dome. So when he picked up the phone, I was delighted by the lightness in his voice and his eagerness to talk.

It was, coincidentally, his birthday.

“I’m the first one to admit that I’ve said a lot of stupid shit,” Nico says, laughing. “I kind of overdid it,” he adds, regarding the influence his reading had on his music. “I had a moment where I was like, ‘No, fuck that.’ I want to be influenced by people. I don’t want to be so referential to other culture. I want to be referential to 20-year-old feelings.”

“I had a moment where I was like, ‘No, fuck that.’ I want to be influenced by people. I don’t want to be so referential to other culture.”

On a recent evening, as Darkside took the stage at the Fillmore, the historic San Francisco venue that Pink Floyd played 33 years before, I couldn’t contain myself. I’d struggled at work earlier that day, my hands trembling from two months of accumulated anticipation. Backlit in orange and yellow, Harrington carved psychedelic guitar solos into Nico’s lush electronic landscape, which buzzed and crunched with snare and cymbal strikes. When the bass finally came in, the room seemed drop to 300 feet below sea level, and my stomach jumped up into my throat—a bubble of glee not unlike the feeling you get from too much coffee. I closed my eyes, not by choice, but by the intractable, unaccountably swollen force gravity worked upon them. My knees went weak, and I couldn’t keep a shit-eating grin off my face. I kept throwing my elbow into my cousin’s shoulder to express my feelings.

“At first I thought, ‘Oh, you know, the dance club should be a contemplative place where we think about things blah-blah-blah,'” Nico told me. He laughed. “Then I went 180 degrees: It’s a place where we absolutely should forget, because it is shitty. Because everything is shitty.”

But wait, hadn’t he also said that the new album is all about “realism” and the idea that “sadly, no, things are not always so ethereal and pure and philosophical and all this bullshit”?

“Maybe the Trojan horse metaphor is the best one,” he suggested. The message is hidden in the music, and the Fillmore crowd, in full swoon, was “forgetting at the same time as remembering, in the most simultaneous way possible.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate