Tech Mogul Tom Perkins Doubles Down on Comparing Treatment of the 1 Percent to the Holocaust

“People have no idea what the 1 percent is actually contributing to America.”

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jdlasica/9735234550/sizes/z/in/photolist-fQgC4y-fPEofs-fPFJRj-fPpakg-fPFL4f-5tyZ7u-5tuDmg-48rQ7m-fPnQt4-fPEoaw-fPFKL7-fPpcDe-u75up-7ZsDnx-5uyEa1-5uuhw6-5uuhTa-5uyEjd-5uuhzt-5uyEd3-5uuhMM-5uuh8a-5uuhQn-5uyEqJ-5uuhi2-5uuhJZ-5uuhGg-5uyEn3-9gjga8-5xuoGx-5xupcH-5xyNaA-5xyMGy-5tywmb-5tumpv-5tuJrH-5tu8kg-5tyAYo-5tyzif-5tyGeG-5tyxPA-5tyCE1-5tz5gS-5tuzGr-5tuxXM-5tz3s7-5turDR-5tyMCq-5tuu6H-5tyTRC-5tyto1/">jdlasica</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Tom Perkins, cofounder of the storied Silicon Valley venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, could have used a forum at San Francisco’s Commonwealth Club to row back from his much-maligned comments comparing the treatment of America’s wealthy by the left to that of Jews under the Nazis. Instead, the man who provided seed money for Amazon and Google doubled down, telling the audience that “I think the parallel holds.”

It was hardly the only bombshell Perkins dropped during a Q&A with Fortune‘s Adam Lashinsky, provocatively entitled, “The War on the 1%.” Asked to offer one idea that could change the world, Perkins proposed a change to Americans’ voting rights: “You don’t get to vote unless you pay $1 in taxes…If you pay $1 million in taxes, you should get a million votes. How’s that?” (In an interview after the forum, Perkins said he was simply “trying to be outrageous.”)

But there was no hint of irony when Perkins repeatedly insisted that the rich are seriously underrated.  “I don’t think people have any idea what the 1 percent is actually contributing to America,” he said at one point.

Coming at a time when the city’s tech boom is creating widening income inequality, Perkins’ talk seemed perfectly calculated to ignite further conflict. He sneered at protests against tech shuttles, casually dismissed gentrification as “inevitable,” advocated for cutting food stamps, and condemned Lyndon B. Johnson’s War on Poverty for “unknowingly creating the destruction of lower-end families in America.”

It was hard to tell from the talk where the real Tom Perkins ended and the caricature of a tech mogul began. Eight years ago, Perkins built a sailing yacht for $130 million. He recently bragged to an interviewer that his Richard Mille watch is worth as much as “a six-pack of Rolexes.” And yet he was visibly troubled when he informed his audience that the “extreme progressivity” of the US tax code “is persecution” of the rich.

“Government is a giant beast which has to be fed,” he said, so it needs taxes to go “up, and up, and up.” When Lashinsky tried to point out that taxes helped fund the creation of the internet, Perkins cut him off: “You’re barking up the wrong tree.”

In other highlights, Perkins (who also repeatedly noted that he’s a “knight of Norway”) argued that:

  • “if Germany had American gun laws, there would have never been a Hitler”
  • the Koch brothers are victims of “persecution”
  • he couldn’t get his start as a paper boy these days due to “child labor laws”
  • Silicon Valley “is a meritocracy. Race has absolutely nothing to do with it.”

During the talk, the octagenarian VC suggested that his outbursts were part of being “in my midlife crisis now.” At a subsequent press conference, he looked tired as he nursed a plastic cup of white wine. “I won’t keep going on this,” he assured a reporter who asked why he continues exposing himself to ridicule.

While acknowledging that wages have remained stagnant for decades despite huge increases in productivity, Perkins offered no solutions for what ails the middle class other than kneecapping teachers’ unions and rekindling the spirit of 1980s Britain. “You need and we need another Margaret Thatcher,” he told the press. “I’ve met Margaret Thatcher, actually. Charming lady. Look, free-market capitalism, it’s what has created most of the wealth in the world, and it’s the only way to proceed. Free. Market. Capitalism.”

About halfway into the forum, Lashinsky asked whether Perkins might have lost touch with the real world. Perkins cheerfully acknowledged the possibility. “Philosophically,” he said, “nobody can prove that they are connected to reality.”

Here’s the full video of the Q&A:

&

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate