The Good Wife’s Brave, Bold Move

CBS

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Do you watch The Good Wife? You should watch The Good Wife. It’s brilliant. It’s amazing. Oh my God, it’s so good. Why aren’t you watching it? Maybe you are watching it. If you are watching it, good. You are smart and you have good taste. But a lot of you aren’t watching it. Do you not like law shows? Who doesn’t like law shows? If you’re not watching it because you don’t like law shows, you should watch The Good Wife because The Good Wife isn’t actually about the law. Or at least not really. It’s about people who happen to be lawyers. Every episode has a case that the cast tackles, but it isn’t important to the overarching plot. It’s simply a vehicle for the melodrama. And the melodrama! Oh how sweet and wonderful the melodrama on The Good Wife is! I think a lot of you don’t watch The Good Wife because it’s on CBS, the Perry Como of American broadcast networks. A certain set of bright young things thinks that anything that comes from Les Moonves’ top-rated network is stale, stodgy, and old. And they aren’t wrong, in general. But they do themselves a disservice when it comes to The Good Wife. If it were on FX, it would be live-tweeted with the gusto of Justified, Mad Men, Homeland and the Queen’s Crown of high-brow pop culture, Game of Thrones.

So if you aren’t watching it, go watch all five seasons right now. Forget your job. Forget your family. Forget your personal hygiene. Go and mainline all of it now.

Go.

Ok, if you have been watching The Good Wife, we need to talk about last night.

SPOILER AHEAD. SPOILER AHEAD.

THIS IS HAPPENING SPOILER IS ABOUT TO HAPPEN LAST EXIT TO WILL IS DEAD.

He’s dead! They killed him! He’s dead! Shot to death in a courtroom! The blond kid he was defending took the gun from the bailiff and shot a bunch of people and Will is dead!

Will! Will, the male lead. The good wife’s boss. The good wife’s lover. One-third of the central tension of the show! He’s dead. He’s dead. He’s dead. I have no coherent thoughts here. Save this: Brave, bold move, The Good Wife. It takes courage to kill off the second most important character on the show. Josh Charles’ deal was up after the fourth season and he signed on for this limited 15 episode run because he loved the show and wanted to give the character a proper signoff.*  This seems like a good out for everybody, but wow! Bold.

Last night’s episode was one of the few genuinely shocking things I’ve seen happen on a fictional TV show.

As Robert and Michelle King, the show’s creators, write in a letter posted on the show’s website, they could “have sent Will to Seattle,” the way ER handled the departure of George Clooney. A weak, sentimental part of me wishes they had done that so Will could come back at some point, but that’s stupid. The bold move was undoubtedly the right one, at least in the short term. Last night’s episode was one of the few genuinely shocking things I’ve seen happen on a fictional TV show. In the long term, who knows what it means for the show and the daily dynamic. I’m sure the writers will be able to convert the old Good Wife into the new Good Wife. And that’s what it will be. The Good Wife 2.0. Because The Good Wife was definitionally about Alicia being pulled in two separate directions, one by Peter and one by Will. What Will represented—independence, vengeance,  the road not taken—remains, but Will is gone.

Will is gone. šŸ™

In the letter the Kings explain, “We chose the tragic route for Will’s send-off for personal reasons. We’ve all experienced the sudden death of a loved one in our lives. It’s terrifying how a perfectly normal and sunny day can suddenly explode with tragedy.” This is true and also heartbreaking when you think about Tony Scott, one of the original executive producers, who died in August of 2012.

RIP Will. Long live The Good Wife.

Here’s a video of the cast and crew talking about Will’s death and Josh Charles’ departure.

 

Correction: An earlier version of this post speculated that Josh Charles was let out of a longer contract early. That is not the case.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate