The US Senate Candidate Who Wants to Occupy Russia

Alaska Republican Joe Miller has a plan to get even with Putin: reclaim eight islands off the coast of Russia.

Alaska Senate candidate Joe MillerBrian Cahn/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


For the last 28 years, Carl Olson of Woodland Hills, California, has had a mission. “It’s not a start-a-war thing, my gosh!,” he says. Olson’s raison d’être: He believes the United States has needlessly ceded eight Arctic islands to Russia, and he wants them back.

Olson thinks he’s finally found a high-profile national ally in Alaska Republican Senate candidate Joe Miller. After speaking with Olson about the issue two years ago, Miller penned an op-ed on the subject for the conservative website WorldNetDaily, a frequent outlet for conspiracy theories about President Barack Obama’s birth.

“Part of Obama’s apparent war against U.S. energy independence includes a foreign-aid program that directly threatens my state’s sovereign territory,” Miller declared. “Obama’s State Department is giving away seven strategic, resource-laden Alaskan islands to the Russians. Yes, to the Putin regime in the Kremlin.”

As Miller put it, “We won the Cold War and should start acting like it.”

Miller was leaving out some key points. As I noted in a July 2012 story on his theory, the United States never made a serious claim to any of the islands. They were all located much closer to the Russian mainland than to Alaska. And most importantly, the Obama administration hadn’t taken any action on the islands—it was honoring a treaty ratified by the Senate and signed into law by President George H.W. Bush 21 years earlier. FactCheck.org weighed in on the theory and declared it lacking.

But after consulting with Olson, Miller doubled down a few days later. While allowing that this was a long-standing issue not unique to Obama, he still chided the administration for letting the Russians off easy. “We are operating under a ‘proposed’ treaty, nothing more,” Miller wrote. “It’s also worth noting that even if we’re wrong on all seven claims, the fact is that Alaska has been frozen out of the process and deserves a seat at the table.”

With Russian troops mobilizing in the Ukraine, Miller has gone silent on the subject of whether the United States should claim the territories for itself—a move that would surely ramp up tensions beyond their current level. His campaign didn’t respond to multiple requests for comment—something that appears to have become a trend for the GOP’s 2010 nominee. He was the only candidate absent from a forum in his hometown of Fairbanks last month. He doesn’t have a campaign website, instead issuing press releases on a news aggregator he launched called “Restore Liberty,” which solicits donations alongside ads for “Arctic Chiropractic and Massage” and “North Pole Family Dentistry.” He has raised just $32,000.

Still, in a heated Republican primary with Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell and former Alaska attorney general Dan Sullivan*, Miller’s in good shape. He took 20 percent of the vote in the most recent poll of the race, just 10 points behind Treadwell, and has until August to catch up. Miller beat incumbent Sen. Lisa Murkowski in the Republican primary four years ago, but Murkowski launched a write-in campaign and beat Miller in a rematch that November. She has said she’ll campaign for whoever runs against Begich this fall, but, “If Joe Miller wins, I’m not probably going to be working too hard.”

Olson, who thinks the US could claim the islands in a peaceful fashion, hasn’t heard back from Miller since the recent escalation of tensions with Russia. But he thinks the situation shows the urgency of reclaiming the islands. “My goodness!” he says. “The Ukraine’s kind of an okay country. But this is in our own backyard. We lose lots of oil and gas rights and all that sort of stuff by allowing this to proceed.”

And they’re not the only islands Olson wants back under US control. His organization, State Department Watch, runs direct-mail campaigns to raise awareness about dozens of other flyspecks on the map—covering a land-and-water area equivalent to India and Pakistan combined—that he’d like the country to take control of under an obscure law called the Guano Islands Act. For now, though, the last full measure of Manifest Destiny just might have to wait.

Correction: This article originally misidentified US Senate candidate Dan Sullivan as the mayor of Anchorage.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate