There’s an Award for Comprehensible Writing in Government. Guess Who Won.

In which we attend the Oscars of bureaucratic paperwork.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's award-winning loan document.Center for Plain Language; <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-124135240/stock-vector-set-of-bright-emblems.html?src=h8m0hbL62VXXJqzLwOtWew-1-94">iro4ka</a>/Shutterstock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It’s like the Oscars, but for paperwork.

The Clearmark Awards, sponsored by the DC-based Center for Plain Language, are handed out annually to the government agencies, corporations, and nonprofits that produce the most coherent literature. On Tuesday, for the 11th-consecutive year, the nominees gathered at the National Press Club in downtown Washington to nibble on chocolate mousse and celebrate their colleagues for making bureaucratic copy comprehensible. Up for awards were the Social Security Administration, for its redesigned website; the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, for its revision of its rules of procedure; and the National Diabetes Education Program, for its pamphlet on taking care of your feet. In a year in which a broken website became a symbol of bureaucratic ineptitude, these were the heroes the media never told you about.

CPL’s mission is a simple one: Help public- and private-sector institutions produce text that humans can understand. The organization lobbies Congress, hosts seminars, and issues an annual report card rating government agencies on the clarity of their output. “Plain language isn’t a new concept,” explained CPL board member Jana Goldman, a former National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration public affairs officer. “There was a Swedish king about 400 years ago who wanted everything in plain Swedish.” 

CPL’s roots trace back to 1998, when Annetta Cheek, the plain language expert for Al Gore’s Reinventing Government task force, convinced the vice president to hand out a monthly “No Gobbledygook” award to agencies that successfully translated their agenda into vernacular. After she left the administration, she helped launch CPL, and in 2010, the organization scored its biggest win, when Rep. Bruce Braley (D-Iowa)—now a candidate for US Senate—pushed the Plain Writing Act through Congress and across the president’s desk. The law requires agencies to emphasize “clear Government communication that the public can understand and use.”

Big health care companies such as Aetna have emerged as the Meryl Streeps of the clear-language competition, bringing home awards year after year for documents like a Medicare age-in letter (contact information printed in a box in the top-right corner!). At this year’s ceremony, attendees speculated that because health care paperwork can literally mean life or death, the insurance industry was compelled to gets its act together in the clarity department. 

There was also a consensus on which sector is consistently the worst at making its content readable. “The finance industry doesn’t get it,” said Cheek.

I asked her why that is, and she paused for a moment.

“Arrogance.”

At the Press Club, the competition was intense, but good-spirited. A woman shrieked for joy when Aetna took home a prize for the redesign of its Medicare Advantage enrollment packet. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry’s “Don’t Mess With Mercury” project edged out the Social Security Administration and Texas Department of Information Resources for the honor of best public website. According to the citation, “this website may be targeted for students and teachers, but it’s informative and fun for everyone”—which is something that can’t be said of mercury. Health Care Services Corporation’s new claims letters won best “revised document” in the nonprofit category. March of Dimes, last year’s overall winner, failed to repeat, despite a crisp booklet on post-partum depression. Category winners took home a hockey-puck sized glass disk with the Clearmark emblem. The grand-prize winner received a glass cylinder, the length of a relay race baton, with a lightbulb inside.

The institutions that haven’t mastered the art of plain language (which is to say, most of them) have their place, too. The CPL’s version of the Razzies, the Wondermarks, honors the year’s worst messaging efforts, such as the byzantine discharge form used by Charlotte, North Carolina’s Presbyterian Hospital, and an impenetrable consent decree from the Federal Motor Carrier and Safety Administration. Also called out was a road sign from the California Department of Transportation. It’s 47 words long—one for every car you’ll rear-end when you try to read it: “No person shall, on a Friday, Saturday or Sunday the day preceding a public holiday, or on a public holiday, drive or cause to be driven between the hours of 6 p.m. and midnight, a motor vehicle which exceeds 10.5 m in length in all main roads.”

Tim Murphy

The big winner of the night was the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the agency created by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law, at Elizabeth Warren’s behest, and designed to safeguard regular folks from financial chicanery. The agency received the Grand Clearmark award, the CPL’s top honor, for its new loan modification tutorial. “There’s a sense of full revelation—no tricks, no hidden revelation,” one judge gushed.

A dozen or so employees of the young bureau were euphoric as they took the stage to claim the award. Helping consumers decipher complicated legalese they’re not meant to understand is one of the CFPB’s main missions, and they view this as validation. “It’s our bread and butter,” said Kelly Cochran, the agency’s acting assistant director for regulations. “It’s one of our most basic tools—providing information consumers need.”

The CFPB’s win was a victory of sorts for the center, which, as Cheek noted, has struggled to bring the financial sector on board. But the mission of ridding the nation of bureaucratese has lately hit a snag in place that, fittingly, often defies comprehension: Congress. After the passage of the Plain Writing Act in 2010, CPL has been stymied in its push for a sequel: The Plain Regulations Act, which would extend the bill’s guidelines to cover rulemaking, has gone nowhere. Cheek lamented that with Braley locked in a high-profile election, the odds of another bipartisan victory are slim.

“Things have been so partisan lately, we can’t do anything,” Cheek said. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate