Will Mitch McConnell’s Campaign Manager Get Caught Up in a Bribery Investigation?

The FEC is weighing whether to investigate Jesse Benton—and a group of Ron Paul alums—for buying an endorsement.

Jesse Benton campaigning for Ron Paul in 2011 <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/22007612@N05/6050853882/in/photolist-adGd3W-7zx7GH-84bFAd-bnoQv4-9vusDf-9X4cVs-9X1koH-9mVG4h-b9Z47g-8bApGx-9iMHuT-eYX4JY-eYKJ6B-8VbAkk-8VcfeT-93Rkkf-7FHdu7">Gage Skidmore</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


An intriguing catfight has been brewing on the right—and it could possibly affect the reelection campaign of Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the Republican Senate leader. A former aide to Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) has asked the Federal Elections Commission to investigate whether Ron Paul’s 2012 presidential campaign violated federal law by bribing an Iowa state senator to win his endorsement. The complaint letter, sent by ex-Bachmanner Peter Waldron, charges that senior members of Paul’s campaign—including Jesse Benton, who is now McConnell’s campaign manager—were party to the bribe or knew about it. The role of specific Ron Paul aides in the scheme is unclear, but a 2013 Iowa Senate Ethics Committee report cited by Waldron states that the Paul campaign exchanged money to purchase the endorsement.

The controversy concerns the curious actions of a prominent local politician during the 2012 Republican caucuses in the Hawkeye State. Then-GOP state Sen. Kent Sorenson was an influential figure in the social-conservative wing of the state Republican Party, and he had offered his support to Bachmann’s presidential effort early in the 2012 campaign. Sorenson and Bachmann were natural allies; both were crusaders against abortion and same-sex marriage. Sorenson served as co-chairman of Bachmann’s campaign in Iowa and was a frequent surrogate speaker for her. But less than a week before caucus day, Sorenson made a surprise appearance at a Ron Paul rally in Des Moines, where he shocked Iowa political observers by switching his endorsement to the libertarian candidate.

Bachmann immediately cried foul. “Kent Sorenson personally told me he was offered a large sum of money to go to work for the Paul campaign,” she said shortly after he flipped. At the time, Bachmann’s claim was largely written off as an accusation leveled by a candidate in a political death spiral. But in recordings of phone calls leaked last year to the Iowa Republican, a conservative website covering Iowa politics, Sorenson said that he had received, by way of his wife, a check from Paul’s deputy campaign manager, Dimitri Kesari. A subsequent investigation by the Iowa Senate Ethics Committee revealed that Kesari had paid Sorenson $25,000 for his endorsement. Sorenson also received $73,000 in subsequent payments of unknown origin, though the committee had a “strong suspicion” that money was also tied to the Paul campaign. Sorenson resigned from the state Senate as a result.

On Monday, the Iowa Republican published a complaint letter Waldron sent to the FEC at the end of February. In the letter, Waldron claimed that Benton, who had been the chairman of Ron Paul’s presidential campaign, and other Paul campaign aides had known about or had been involved in the bribe. The FEC responded last week by noting that it would follow is usual procedure and request responses from those Waldron had accused. After receiving those responses, the FEC told Waldron, its analysts would examine the allegation and decide whether or not to recommend a full investigation.

Benton is a close ally of the Paul family. In addition to guiding Ron Paul’s 2012 campaign, he’s married to the former congressman’s granddaughter. He also worked for Rand Paul’s 2010 Senate campaign, living in the younger Paul’s basement. In late 2012, Mitch McConnell brought Benton on board to manage his reelection in an attempt to assuage the Paulites and tea partiers in Kentucky.

Benton’s involvement, if any, in the Sorenson affair is murky. In one of the leaked phone calls, Sorenson says, “Oh, I know Jesse knows. I know Jesse knows,” while discussing the check he received from the Paul campaign. But in a leaked phone call between Benton and former Ron Paul aide Dennis Fusaro, Benton says, “I don’t know anything about that,” when Fusaro referenced the allegation that Sorenson had been bribed. During the call, Benton says, “I’ve got shared responsibility, so if you’ve got proof, I’d like to take action.”

Waldron’s complaint mentioned several other Republicans who would probably participate in a Rand Paul presidential campaign, should the senator run for the White House in 2016. These include John Tate, Ron Paul’s 2012 national campaign manager, and Drew Ivers, a longtime Paul organizer in Iowa.

Benton and the McConnell campaign did respond to requests for comment.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate