Here Are the Wildest Anti-Obama Quotes From the Host of Hillary Clinton’s First 2014 Political Event

Clinton is scheduled to stump for her daughter’s mother-in-law at the New York apartment of Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild, who has said Obama is a “loser.”

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1EZJ2hN3a8">TooneyReed</a>/YouTube

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Next week, Hillary Clinton will make her first appearance at a political event since leaving the State Department last year. Clinton is scheduled to headline a May 15 fundraiser for Marjorie Margolies, who is running for a House seat in Pennsylvania. Margolies, who held the seat in the early 1990s but lost it after she cast the tie-breaking vote to pass Bill Clinton’s 1993 budget, is a Clinton in-law. Her son, Marc Mezvinsky, is married to Chelsea Clinton.

It’s natural that Clinton would help Margolies. What’s intriguing is the evening’s host, Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild, a fierce and longtime critic of Clinton’s former boss, President Barack Obama. De Rothschild, a billionaire CEO who runs a private investment company, backed Clinton in the Democratic primary in 2008 but became a leading anti-Obama PUMA activist (it stands for Party Unity My Ass) after Obama vanquished Clinton. De Rothschild claimed that Obama would ruin the country and went so far as to endorse Sen. John McCain in the general election that year. “What [Obama] offers may be, in substance and in spirit, a radical departure from the principles of the American Dream that has defined our nation over the last two centuries,” she wrote in an op-ed. Since then, de Rothschild has ruthlessly attacked the president, calling him a loser, claiming he’s out to destroy the American dream, and arguing that his success has more to do with his race than his actions.

During the 2008 campaign, de Rothschild’s harsh criticism of Obama captured the attention of the cable news circuit. She made the rounds, claiming that she was defending the interests of middle-class voters against Obama’s elitism. “The class war that Barack Obama would like to declare in this country to divide people is so wrong,” she said during an interview with CNN, and she compared Obama to Adlai Stevenson—as part of the wing of the Democratic Party that thinks “they are grander than the rest of us.” Even CNN’s Campbell Brown pointed out that de Rothschild and her husband are billionaires who are hardly representative of modest middle-class interests.

Here are a few other highlights from de Rothschild’s time as an Obama denouncer:

  • In 2010 she went on MSNBC to attack Obama’s record on unemployment: “My biggest disappointment is that this Democrat is messing with the sauce of American goodness, of American greatness. He’s making us feel like our government needs to take care of us.”
  • That year, she wrote an op-ed for the Daily Beast titled “I Told You So” and claimed that all of Obama’s bipartisan rhetoric was just a sham to get elected.
  • She founded a think tank, called the Henry Jackson Initiative For Inclusive Capitalism, to defend capitalism after Occupy Wall Street. “What victory would look like is lower unemployment, higher growth and Occupy Wall Street saying, ‘Hey, we’ve got jobs now, we’re on our way to becoming the top 1 percent,'” she said about the project.
  • She backed Jon Huntsman’s presidential aspirations in 2011 and 2012. Rothschild claimed that Obama’s success in the previous election had more to do with his race than his résumé. “The fact of his personal story of being half black and all that is a wonderful, inspiriting story,” she said. “But it doesn’t qualify him to be president.”
  • “[Obama] is lost,” she said in a 2011 interview with Salon. “The man is a loser. The man is not listening to people who might help him. And four more years of Barack Obama will be devastating for the country.” She told the website that she was more energized to defeat Obama in 2012 than she had been in 2008. “He is going to bankrupt America,” she said. “He’s so vain and he’s so convinced of his own transcendence as a solution to everything that he’s incapable of doing the right thing for the country.” She also said Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.) and Democratic New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo deserved the presidency more than Obama.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate