There’s a Satirical, Naughty Musical About the Clinton White House Opening in New York. Listen to One of the Songs.

<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hillary_Clinton_Bill_Chelsea_on_parade.jpg">The White House</a>/Wikimedia Commons

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


If the musical-theater community could find it in itself to create a cantata telling the story of a Twitter war between Paul Krugman and the president of Estonia, then surely a musical about the Clinton administration couldn’t have been that far behind.

On July 18, Clinton: The Musical will premiere at the Alice Griffin Jewel Box Theatre as part of the New York Musical Theatre Festival. (The festival has previously hosted such successful productions as Next to Normal and Altar Boyz, prior to their respective Broadway runs.) The book for Clinton was written by Australian writing duo and brothers Paul and Michael Hodge, and music and lyrics were penned by Paul Hodge. An earlier, shorter version was nominated for best new musical at the 2012 Edinburgh Festival Fringe, and a subsequent incarnation was mounted at London’s King’s Head Theatre the following year.

The idea for the musical emerged out of a Hodge family outing. “My family and I went to go and see a musical in Australia about an Australian politician, back in 2006 or 2007,” Paul Hodge tells Mother Jones. “And after the show, my dad said, ‘Oh, it was good, but politicians don’t make good subjects for musicals. The only politician who would make a good subject for that would be Bill Clinton.’ And I said, ‘Of course!'”

Clinton, a two-act musical satire, covers the eight years of Bill Clinton’s presidency. According to Paul, the music ranges from more traditional American musical styles to burlesque to 1990s pop. As for comedic influences, Paul cites Arrested Development, The Simpsons, and 30 Rock.

The cast of characters includes Bill, Hillary, Dick Morris, Newt Gingrich, Monica Lewinsky, and former Clinton special prosecutor Kenneth Starr. In the musical, President Clinton is portrayed by two actors: one plays the more serious, presidential side of Clinton, the other plays the party animal, scandal-prone Clinton. (Karl Kenzler, who played a senator on the US version of House of Cards, has the role of the less sleazy “W.J. Clinton”; Duke Lafoon, who also portrayed Clinton in Monica! The Musical!, a show by Daniel J. Blau, Adam Blau, and Tracie Potochnik, is the naughtier “Billy.”)

“Michael came up with idea that Clinton should be be two actors and two characters,” Paul says. “At first I said, ‘That’s the stupidest idea I’ve ever heard. But then I read Clinton’s autobiography, where he writes about sort of living two parallel lives. And then there was [Clinton adviser] Dick Morris who had [nick]names for him like, ‘Saturday Night Bill‘ and ‘Sunday Morning President Clinton.’ So then I thought that it was actually a really good device to explore a person who is so complex.”

Theatergoers should expect scenes and songs about health care, balanced budgets, the Gingrich-led government shutdowns, and the Lewinsky sex scandal. But don’t expect to hear any songs about Somalia, Rwanda, or Bosnia. “We made a decision to focus on domestic issues rather than foreign policy issues,” Paul says. “When you’re covering eight years of a presidency, the amount of stuff a president has to deal with on a day-to-day basis is enormous…So there will be no international stuff.”

As for the Lewinsky-related tunes, fans of ’90s pop should be pleased. “Monica’s music is more pop, in the direction of S Club 7 and Britney [Spears] and Christina Aguilera,” Paul says. His favorite numbers from the show are “Oh, Yeah,” one of Monica’s songs, and “A Starr is Born,” performed by the Ken Starr character.

Here is a clip, provided to Mother Jones, of one of the Clinton songs, this one simply titled, “No.” Bill and Hillary are forced to make changes to a speech to avoid any potential instance of sexual double entendre. The following audio was recorded during a special performance and press conference held in New York City on Wednesday:

Clinton has already earned itself a fair amount of attention, including from a member of another former first family. Jenna Bush Hager, who is a Today Show special correspondent, recently said on-air, “I just hope Bush: The Musical ain’t next.”

“Jenna can rest easy,” Paul says, adding that he can’t imagine himself ever writing a musical about the Bushes, or the Obamas, or the Carters, or the Reagans, for that matter. “The Clintons are the only ones I can see this working for!”

Clinton‘s festival performances are set to be held between July 18 and 26 (you can get tickets here). However, no word yet on whether anyone from the Clinton family will check it out. (The Clintons reside in New York, and Hillary served as a US senator from the Empire State from 2001 to 2009.) No one involved in the production has heard from Bill or Hillary, and representatives for the Clintons did not respond to Mother Jones‘ requests for comment regarding the musical or potential attendance.

“Being Australian, I’m neither Republican or Democrat, so I don’t come at this from any political standpoint or agenda,” Paul says. “I come at this looking at [the Clintons] as human beings.”

Now, for any hardcore musical fans out there, here’s a taste of Clinton sheet music—for a song titled, “Sexual Relations,” no less:

Clinton: The Musical sheet music

Photo credit: Lilly Charles

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate