This Map Shows Why People Are Freaking Out About Ebola’s Arrival in Senegal

Deadly contagion + international transit hub = bad news.


The ongoing outbreaks of Ebola in West Africa continue to devastate Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea, and recently caused a national emergency in Nigeria—as of August 28, the Centers for Disease Control was putting the suspected and confirmed case count at 3,069, including 1,552 deaths. But in the last few days, with the virus entering Senegal and health workers discovering a fresh outbreak in Nigeria, global health groups such as the World Health Organization are getting increasingly strident with their concerns. On Sunday, WHO officials called Ebola’s arrival in Senegal “a top priority emergency.” On Tuesday, Joanne Liu, international president of the global health organization Doctors Without Borders, warned the United Nations that the world was “losing the battle to contain” the disease. “Leaders are failing to come to grips with this transnational threat,” she said.

There are direct flights from Senegal to major airports in New York City, Paris, Istanbul, Dubai, and Johannesburg.

Senegal, with a population exceeding 13 million, is the fifth country afflicted in the crisis. But it’s an especially worrisome one, because Senegal is an international transit hub. More than 30 carriers fly through the Léopold Sédar Senghor airport in Dakar, on the continent’s westernmost point, ferrying passengers to and from destinations in 25 countries around the world. While most of the routes are regional, some connect with major airports in New York City, Paris, Istanbul, Dubai, and Johannesburg.

Compared to Senegal, the three countries that account for the vast majority of infections to date—Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea (see map below)—were isolated even before the outbreak: You could only fly directly to six destinations each from Liberia or Guinea, while carriers operating in Sierra Leone serviced ten routes. Despite the limited air traffic, the disease jumped borders when an American citizen flew from Liberia to Lagos, Nigeria, and become that country’s first reported infection, prompting some regional carriers to suspend flights to the three countries most affected.

At the end of August, British Airways and Air France also suspended flights to Liberia and Sierra Leone. At the time, British Airways’ service from London to those countries consisted of a single Liberia flight with a stopover in Sierra Leone, four times per week. Air France only had three flights weekly to Sierra Leone, shuttling between Paris and Freetown. “The flight risk is something to be taken fairly seriously,” says Parviez Hosseini, a mathematician and ecologist with the research group EcoHealth Alliance, who has analyzed countries’ risk of exposure based on flight data. “On the other hand, a lot of countries are taking it seriously.”

The CDC’s map of hardest-hit regions, as of August 28  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Ebola’s entry into Nigeria’s largest city in late July was a cause for fear in the global health community for the same reason that many people are concerned about the disease’s entrance into Senegal now. Nigeria, like Senegal, is internationally connected, with flights to and from numerous countries and a running influx of expatriates, mostly affiliated with the nation’s oil industry. A quick response by Nigerian authorities helped keep the case count in Lagos to a minimum—on Tuesday, Nigeria’s health ministry reported a total of just 17 confirmed cases nationwide since the outbreak began.

Yet following the discovery that a physician treating Nigeria’s first case had sought treatment for Ebola in Port Harcourt, an oil industry center where he was attended by numerous medical staff and members of his church, health workers put nearly 200 people there under surveillance. On Wednesday, WHO announced three confirmed cases in Port Harcourt, including the doctor. This new outbreak, the organization says, “has the potential to grow larger and spread faster than the one in Lagos.” 

So far, the skies over Nigeria and Senegal remain crowded. But if Ebola’s arrival in Senegal and Port Harcourt goes unchecked, it will raise concerns about the disease hopping not just between countries, but between continents.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate