The Asian Republican Coalition Is Mostly White and Mostly Endorses White Candidates

Is this how the GOP plans to diversify its voter base?

From left: Rep. Chris Gibson, Carl DeMaio, Allan Fung, Sen. Mitch McConnell, Barbara ComstockPhotos: Mike Groll/AP, Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP,Gretchen Ertl/AP, <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/5437435397">Gage Skidmore</a>/Flickr, and J. Scott Applewhite/AP.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When Democrats tout their strength among minority voters, they’re usually referring to African Americans and Latinos, but over the past few elections Asian Americans have increasingly gone blue as well. Now, a new group is seeking to thwart that trend. The Asian Republican Coalition launched with a splashy event at the Newseum in Washington, DC, in May, drawing GOP heavy-hitters including Sens. John Cornyn, Tim Scott, and Tom Coburn. And last week, the group announced its first set of endorsements, backing five Republican candidates across the country.

Yet, the Asian Republican Coalition appears to be in an awkward position: It seems unable to find many people of Asian descent to endorse or support its cause.

Take their recent batch of endorsements. Of the five Republicans who earned the group’s backing, only one candidate is Asian American—Allan Fung, the gubernatorial candidate in Rhode Island. The group also endorsed incumbents Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Rep. Chris Gibson of New York, along with House candidates Carl DeMaio in California and Barbara Comstock in Virginia.

Political groups that advocate for minority causes often endorse candidates who don’t share the same ethnicity but are friendly to their cause. McConnell’s wife is a Chinese expat (and former Bush administration Cabinet official), while DeMaio and Comstock are running in districts with large Asian American populations. “These candidates believe in creating and building upon strong relationships within the comprehensive Asian American community,” said John Ying, an Asian American investment banker based in Hong Kong and the group’s chairman.

But when his group held its kickoff party, apart from Ying the scene reportedly was full of white politicians and consultants. “We have a very broad definition of what constitutes the Asian American community,” the group’s vice chairman, Thomas Britt, told Vice. “The Asian Republican Coalition is open to all Americans, including Asian Americans and those of us like me who are not ethnically Asian but have spent 20 years living in Hong Kong.”

Back in the early 1990s, Asian Americans skewed slightly Republican, voting 55 percent for George H.W. Bush in 1992. Asian Americans had turned more Democratic by the time his son ran a decade later, voting 54 percent for Al Gore. In 2012, Barack Obama won 73 percent of the Asian American vote, an 11 percent rise from his 2008 performance.

Asian Americans don’t represent as large of a voting bloc as African Americans and Latinos (they constituted just 3 percent of the national vote in 2012), but they’re the fastest-growing segment of the US population—and Asian Americans are considered very reliable when it comes to voter turnout. A survey released earlier this week by APIAVote and Asian Americans Advancing Justice suggested that Asian American turnout of registered voters will range from 60 to 77 percent for the midterms. Of those likely voters, 42 percent plan to vote Democratic in this year’s House races, compared to 28 percent of Asian American voters planning to back Republicans.

As a whole, Asian Americans are richer and have higher educational levels than other ethnic groups, making them a prime target in the view of conservatives. “Frankly this group is nominally right now voting more Democratic, but in a very weak affiliation,” Ying told the Daily Caller. “These are not die-hard Democrats, and traditionally in the past they used to be Republicans.”

But it may not be so easy for Ying and the GOP, given that party’s agenda. A comprehensive Pew study from 2012 found that Asian Americans tend to prefer a larger government and robust social services. It’s not just a lack of outreach that’s holding the GOP back from winning over Asian American voters.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate