Republican David Perdue Wins Georgia Senate Race

The former CEO beat the Democrats’ best hope for a pickup.

Jon-Michael Sullivan/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


There weren’t many bright spots on the map for Democrats this year. But in Georgia, the party was hoping that Senate candidate Michelle Nunn might harness the state’s changing demographics for an upset against GOP nominee David Perdue.

The state’s growing black population, however, and a mammoth effort by Democrats to register these new voters, weren’t enough to boost Nunn to victory. And on Tuesday, Nunn appeared to lose to Perdue handily. This wasn’t a huge surprise: In recent weeks, Nunn’s support slipped among Georgia’s white voters. Nunn needed to win over about a third of them, in addition to drawing a record number of black voters, in order to have a realistic shot of winning the race.

Nunn would have been Democrats’ only pickup in the Senate in an otherwise bleak election. Perdue and Nunn were competing for the seat held by the retiring Chambliss.

Republicans and Democrats both ran huge, data-driven voter mobilization campaigns in Georgia in response to a small but steady shift in the state’s demographics. But local GOP officials may have given Republicans an edge by using dubious reasoning to purge the state’s existing voter rolls of untold numbers of black residents.

The New Georgia Project, a nonpartisan group with Democratic connections, collected applications to register more than 86,000 mostly young and minority residents. But in October, the group discovered that 40,000 of those potential voters never appeared on the voter rolls. New Georgia Project blamed the missing applications on Republican Secretary of State Brian Kemp. But a judge declined to force Kemp to register the missing voters, meaning those voters would have to cast provisionary ballots.

Any Democrat still would have faced long odds in Georgia. Nunn had an edge thanks to resume. Nunn spent several years as CEO of Points of Light, a non-profit volunteer corps with roots in a service initiative started by President George H. W. Bush. And her father is a popular former senator, Sam Nunn.

Nunn’s chances looked best early on in the race, when she faced a Republican primary field of Todd Akins-in-waiting—including one candidate, Georgia Rep. Phil Gingrey, who said that Akin was “partly right” about “legitimate rape.” Perdue, however, who won the GOP nomination in July, is a sober-seeming former CEO. He touted his work as a “job creator” and led in most polls against Nunn throughout the race.

But Perdue’s past as a business leader presented its own controversy. In early October, reports emerged that Perdue spent most of his career—as he put it—outsourcing. “Defend it? I’m proud of it,” he told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, when questioned on his outsourcing record. Nunn’s campaign and EMILY’s List, a political group that supports female Democrats, spent millions of dollars airing several ads about Perdue’s record on women. The ads focused on the fact that Dollar General paid its female store managers less than male managers while Perdue was CEO.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate