Trump to Serious Political Consultant: You’re Hired!

Donald Trump’s entire Iowa operation is a dude with a pickup truck.

<a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/5440606864/in/photolist-9hHrit-9kwYUn-5ae5pK-oep83L-cJjFP-9hKoKX-9hKqAn-9hNuLJ-9hHrVT-dS85iC-jDzuj6-9hLxAs-9hNxeN-afUurt-9hLwSC-9hLx6s-9hLvZL-9hLwdw-9hHqq6-9hHqDv-9v62wo-9hKrun-9hNwCN-9hNvKd-9hNwi1-9hKpmZ-9hNwso-9hKrPH-9hKraP-9hKrkx-ekAiEk-5KnqeT-HkLZL-jUPKkF-e21BG2-4wXpSa-7hrC5a-iiVQvs-9hHpJr-9hNvWh-9hKpTt-9hNvfQ-9hNvzC-9hKoVK-9hKp4g-eULu15-5yHWVR-2oQiC-9KUYs-xRyc1">Gage Skidmore</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Another presidential election season has begun. So, naturally, Donald Trump is once again trolling the United States with the prospect he will run for the highest office in the land. But unlike his past presidential flirtations, Trump’s intentions this time around appear to be possibly—perhaps, maybe, conceivably—a bit more serious. That’s because the publicity-loving real estate tycoon has managed to convince one of Iowa’s most sought-after conservative operatives to join his campaign—that is, if there is a campaign.

In February, Trump announced that Chuck Laudner would be joining his “growing team” as Trump “strongly consider[s] running for president in 2016.” Trump told the Des Moines Register that Laudner was “my first choice, my second choice, and my third choice” to lead his Iowa efforts (if there are to be Iowa efforts). “I’ve liked Chuck from day one,” he said.

For Trump, there’s a lot to like about Laudner. The 49-year-old is a former chair of the state GOP and served as Rep. Steve King’s chief of staff. Laudner solidified his national reputation in 2012, when he ran Rick Santorum’s Iowa operation. Laudner drove the candidate to each of Iowa’s 99 counties in his Dodge Ram pickup that became famous (at least within Iowa) as the “Chuck Truck.” Santorum edged out Mitt Romney to win Iowa. Laudner was hailed.

So the question for political observers is not why Trump would choose Laudner, but why Laudner would choose Trump?

Conservative media buzzed when the news broke of Trump’s big get. Iowa conservative radio host Steve Deace told Breitbart, “Trump signing Laudner—who had other options—that would be an instant signal that he is serious…This is a major coup for Donald. Major coup.” One of the “other options” Laudner apparently passed up was working again with his old pal Santorum, who appears to be preparing for a 2016 bid. Laudner’s decision to join Trump is also curious on another level. After all, the thrice-married Trump is hardly the poster boy for the Christian conservative values Laudner has long promoted. Laudner did not respond to requests for comment.

After years of working for conservative causes and candidates in the Hawkeye State, Laudner has forged strong ties to a network of social conservatives who wield outsize influence in Iowa’s much-watched presidential caucus. In 2010, Laudner helped design a recall campaign targeting three Iowa State Supreme Court justices who had ruled in favor of gay marriage. A powerful coalition of religious activists came together to back the effort and, after spending nearly a million dollars, it successfully unseated the judges. Progressives argued that the result was a dangerous politicization of the state judiciary, subjecting it to the pressures of interest groups and the effects of political spending.

Jeff Link, a longtime Iowa Democratic operative, says partnering with Trump seems an unusual choice for Laudner. The billionaire has been an outspoken critic of President Barack Obama—and remains a leading birther—but his record on conservative social issues has been inconsistent at best. Trump identifies himself as a “Sunday church person,” and has recently opposed same-sex marriage and abortion, but not too long ago he was pro-choice and supported robust partner benefits for same-sex couples.

When Laudner signed on with Santorum in 2011, he declared, “I’m not looking for someone who checks the pro-life box on a survey. I want a pro-life hero who has been in the arena moving the ball.” That’s not a description that fits Trump.

One obvious speculation is that Trump attracted Laudner with his big bucks. But Craig Robinson, a top conservative journalist in Iowa, wrote in 2011 that money doesn’t concern Laudner: “There is never any sort of negotiation on salary, benefits, hours, or even a title. In fact, those are the things that turn him off.” Laudner indicates he believes Trump is the right person to galvanize the conservative vote. He told the Des Moines Register, “Someone of his stature, his fame and the size of his audience? It should be our target to convince those people that we should move the political center to the right.” He added that Team Trump operates rather smoothly: “It’s not like any other political shop I’ve ever worked in. It’s all business.”

Whatever the reason Laudner has joined forces with Trump, this move has political observers inside and outside Iowa wondering if this time the reality-show tycoon plans to do more than tease.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate