Bon Jovi and Chris Christie: It’s Complicated

The New Jersey rocker gave the governor permission to use his songs.

(AP Photo/Mel Evans, Pool)

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When Chris Christie took the stage at his high school alma mater to announce his presidential run, he entered and left to the music of a New Jersey rocker. Not Bruce Springsteen—Christie is a fanatic Boss devotee—but Jon Bon Jovi. It was no surprise a Springsteen tune wasn’t used; he’s a well-known supporter of Democratic candidates and has lampooned Christie for the Bridgegate scandal.

But Bon Jovi? He, too, is a backer of Democrats. In fact, the previous night he and his wife hosted a fundraiser for Clinton: an intimate concert which cost $2,700 per person and netted in the neighborhood of half a million dollars for her campaign. In 2007, he donated $2,300 to Clinton’s primary campaign, and $4,600 to Obama after Clinton left the race. He’s donated to other Democrats as well — including Sens. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) and Al Franken (D-Minn.). And, in 2010, Obama appointed Bon Jovi to serve on an advisory council to help develop community outreach programs.

So why were his anthemic rock songs being used to sell Christie? Did the governor make the common mistake of trying to expropriate a song from a rocker who would subsequently complain and denounce the candidate. (See Donald Trump and Neil Young.)

Well, Christie did the honorable thing. He asked for permission. And Bon Jovi said yes. In a statement to Mother Jones, Bon Jovi explained, “My friendships are apolitical. And, yes, I absolutely gave him permission to use my songs.”

The back story: Though Bon Jovi has been a committed Democrat who has devoted much time and money to assisting the D—and he’s a been a die-hard fan of Bill and Hillary Clinton—he and Christie became pals during the Hurricane Sandy period. During that time, the singer was much involved in the relief effort. So when Christie asked to use his tunes—including “We Weren’t Born To Follow”—Bon Jovi put friendship ahead of politics.

But Christie didn’t use what is perhaps Bon Jovi’s biggest hit, “Livin’ on a Prayer.” Bon Jovi sang that song at the Hillary Clinton fundraiser.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate