Ted Cruz Just Went Ballistic on Mitch McConnell on the Senate Floor

The Texas Senator calls the GOP leader a liar.

 

“I’m not interested in Republican on Republican violence,” Sen. Ted Cruz said recently on Meet the Press, when asked to weigh in on Donald Trump’s controversial comments about Mexican immigrants. But on the Senate floor on Friday, Cruz showed no such reluctance. He lashed out fiercely against a fellow Republican—and not just any fellow Republican. In a move that stunned veteran congressional reporters, the freshmen senator and presidential hopeful strongly denounced Mitch McConnell, publicly calling the Republican majority leader a liar.

Longtime congressional reporter Paul Kane of the Washington Post tweeted that Cruz’s attack on McConnell was unprecedented.

Fox New’s Chad Pergram called it an “extraordinary scene.”

Cruz’s tirade against the Republican leader lasted nearly 20 minutes. In scalding tones, he blasted McConnell for setting up a vote to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank, which provides financing and loan guarantees to help American corporations secure international contracts. The Ex-Im Bank, whose charter expired at the end of June, has been targeted by tea party-ish conservatives, who believe the institution perpetuates government-subsidized corporate cronyism. Cruz alleged the reauthorization vote was part of a secret deal McConnell cut with Democrats and that McConnell lied to Cruz and his fellow Republican senators about the existence of this agreement.

“Today is a sad day for this institution,” Cruz began. “These hundred senators have to be able to trust that when a senator says something, he or she will do it. Even if we disagree on substance, that we don’t lie to each other.”

Cruz then listed his accusations against McConnell. It all began, he noted, with a vote on Trade Promotion Authority (TPA) several weeks prior. At the time, Cruz suspected that the leader had promised to help reauthorize the Ex-Im Bank’s charter in exchange for Democratic support for the TPA, and, he said, he had asked McConnell point-blank, at a lunch of the entire Republican caucus, if he had cut such a deal. McConnell, he claimed, told him no. “There is no deal, there is no deal, there is no deal,” Cruz recalled McConnell saying. “Like Saint Peter, he repeated it three times.”

But, Cruz said, it “became abundantly clear there was a deal.” Now, Cruz claimed, McConnell is fulfilling his side of the bargain by setting up a vote on an amendment to the must-pass highway bill that will reauthorize the bank. He also accused McConnell of introducing an amendment to repeal Obamacare—that is sure to fail—in order to appease the Ex-Im Bank’s critics. Cruz called this gambit “empty showmanship.”

“What we just saw today was an absolute demonstration that not only what he told every Republican senator but what he told the press over and over again was a simple lie,” Cruz said.

Next Cruz launched into a populist attack on both parties for backing the bank, which he called “a classic example of cronyism and corporate welfare.” Both parties, he said, took checks from lobbyists on K Street, then teamed up in “looting the taxpayer” to aid big corporations.

The only person who made out okay in Cruz’s tirade was Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a progressive and fellow presidential candidate who also opposes the Ex-Im Bank. “I’ll give credit to Sen. Sanders for standing against corporate welfare,” Cruz said.

McConnell’s spokesman did not respond immediately to a request for comment.

In recent days, as Donald Trump has come to dominate the GOP presidential contest, other Republican candidates have employed extreme measures to gain attention as they seek to qualify for the first GOP debate scheduled in two weeks. Rand Paul chain-sawed through the tax code. Lindsey Graham lit a cell phone on fire. With this move, Cruz targeted a Republican leader who has not been too popular among the GOP tea party base. And, at least, he was guaranteed coverage on C-SPAN.

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate