The 5 Unmissable Moments From the Big GOP Showdown

Trump vs. Kelly, Rand vs. Christie, and Ben Carson on waterboarding.

Andrew Harnik/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


From Donald Trump to Rand Paul to Chris Christie to, well, Donald Trump, the first Republican primary debate of the season did not disappoint. So without further ado, here are the highlights from Thursday night’s Fox News debate, featuring the 10 leading candidates.

Donald Trump v. Megyn Kelly

At Thursday night’s debate, Fox News host Megyn Kelly and billionaire bombast Donald Trump went head-to-head. Early in the debate, Kelly, one of three moderators, questioned Trump on his record of making demeaning comments about women. “You’ve called women you don’t like ‘fat pigs, dogs, slobs, and disgusting animals,'” Kelly said. “Only Rosie O’Donnell,” Trump responded, prompting applause. “No, it wasn’t,” Kelly replied.

The exchange went downhill from there. Trump, being Trump, did not hold back: “Honestly Megyn, if you don’t like it, I’m sorry. I’ve been very nice to you, although I could probably maybe not be, based on the way you have treated me.”

Watch the exchange:

Rand Paul v. Chris Christie

The award for biggest spat of the night went to Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who engaged in a shouting match over the issue of government surveillance. Paul, who has been vocal about ending the government’s sweeping collection of Americans’ communications records, said that Christie doesn’t understand the Fourth Amendment and the Bill of Rights. Christie responded by invoking the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Rand Paul recalled that Christie once hugged President Obama—that post-Superstorm Sandy photo-op that still haunts Christie among some conservatives. Christie responded by pointing out that he had hugged victims of 9/11. It wasn’t pretty.

Trump takes credit for illegal immigration debate

Nevermind that Republicans have been at war with President Obama over immigration—and particularly the president’s executive orders granting deferred action to about 5 million undocumented immigrants. To Donald Trump, no one would be talking about undocumented immigrants if it weren’t for him. The GOP frontrunner claimed Thursday that if it weren’t for him—remember when he suggested that undocumented immigrants from Mexico are rapists?—no one would be discussing this hot-button issue.

“So, if it weren’t for me, you wouldn’t even be talking about illegal immigration, Chris,” he said to moderator Chris Wallace, who challenged Trump to back up his allegations that the Mexican government is sending its criminals over the border into the United States. Trump continued: “Our politicians are stupid. And the Mexican government is much smarter, much sharper, much more cunning. And they send the bad ones over because they don’t want to pay for them. They don’t want to take care of them…Why should they when the stupid leaders of the United States will do it for them? And that’s what is happening whether you like it or not.”
 

Trump explains why Hillary Clinton attended his wedding

Turns out, Trump paid the Democratic front-runner to attend his wedding. Explaining why he donated money to Democrats over the years, Trump said he was taking advantage of a “broken system” in which he gives money to politicians and gets favors in return. “When I need something from them two years later, three years later, I call them, they are there for me,” he said.

So what did he get from Hillary Clinton? “For Hillary Clinton, I said come to my wedding and she came to my wedding,” he said. “She had no choice because I gave.”

That’s a pretty expensive wedding guest.
 

Ben Carson is on board with waterboarding

Asked whether he would bring back the practice of waterboarding that the government employed on detainees under President George W. Bush, Carson—who was generally vague—seemed to say he would. “What we do in order to get the info that we need is our business. And I wouldn’t necessarily be broadcasting to everybody what we’re going to do,” Carson said during Thursday’s debate. “We’ve gotten into this mindset of fighting politically correct wars. There is no such thing as a politically correct war.”

“Believe me,” he added, “if we gave them the mission, which is what the commander-in-chief, if we don’t tie their hands behind their back, they’ll do it extremely effectively.”

Oh, and did he mention that he is “the only one to separate Siamese twins”? Yes, he did.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate