Admit It: You’re Kinda Going to Miss John Boehner

His successor will be just as conservative and much less interesting.

<a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/26025669@N03/18337801989/in/photolist-tWs2DP-4TrZJ9-7AJ7Z5-7AEn1B-7AEmVn-7AJ7QA-7AEmBB-rrt9RA-qh62K7-mrsQj6-4TrZKE-dyCu66-5ZWg6R-dyQNQV-vLK5ac-mrsNxv-dyCkne-4TrZNo-mqMFU9-qh5Na1-mqMCQo-dyHQgh-dyHWef-dyHXbG-dyCsAK-dyWgi9-dyWfzb-dyQMu4-dyQNh8-dyWgtq-gJdanr-dz164D-9bvaSB-9byhkA-5qcFBg-9bvaZR-hgCR5Y-giw1HL-nDC5eZ-msyeaG-paRiJq-nWBsXR-5uF93Y-5uF9oL-5uAPJe-5uAPYK-5uFbSy-5uAPAt-5uFcA7-5uAPb8">na10losabe</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Speaker of the House John Boehner is leaving Congress, and my boss David Corn says good riddance.

In November 2009, he and other GOP leaders hosted an anti-Obamacare rally at the Capitol, where enraged protesters chanted, “Nazis, Nazis,” in reference to Democrats working to enact the Affordable Care Act. Boehner never tried to tamp down this sort of conservative anger. He did not tell the birthers to knock it off. He encouraged Obama hatred, allowing the Benghazistas to run free and filing a lawsuit against Obama to satisfy the Obama haters. Ultimately, he became a prisoner of these passions, and his speakership became mainly about one thing: preserving his own job.

This is all true enough. Allow me to present an alternative view: I kind of like John Boehner, and so should you.

He was (and is) a well-drawn character in a city of empty suits, a man who wore his emotions on his super-tanned face. It seems appropriate that Americans’ lasting image of Boehner will be of the Republican speaker of the House standing behind Pope Francis as the leader of the church addressed Congress, and again shortly afterward as he addressed a crowd outside the Capitol. Boehner’s face was puckered; he looked as if he might be chewing on his own tongue. As usual, he was in tears.

Boehner never took many steps to mask his essential Boehner-ness. He reeked of cigarettes (according to Paul Ryan), and drank merlot while negotiating with President Barack Obama (according to Boehner). He always seemed to be crying. Even his favorite haunts were in character. There is a mediocre Tex-Mex restaurant right across the street from the Capitol, where Ryan used to wait tables, but Boehner was a regular at Guapo’s in Northern Virginia instead. The place is known for its extra-strong margaritas.

In 2014, he very enthusiastically released a how-to video on brining a Thanksgiving turkey. Months earlier, he filmed himself cutting grass.

Boehner’s one true love, other than wine and cigarettes, was Pete’s Diner, a Capitol Hill joint where he ate breakfast every morning. Pete’s Diner was John Boehner’s Joe Biden’s Amtrak, to the point that when Esquire asked him to offer an endorsement—it could be of anything—for a 2014 issue, he offered this vaguely Eeyorish pitch for Pete’s:

Look at John Boehner calling out his own diner for making lousy bacon in the pages of one of the world’s most prestigious magazines. And people say he didn’t lead!

The good people at White Castle agree with me. In 2011 the fast-food chain inducted Boehner into its prestigious Cravers Hall of Fame. According to a press release, “As part of the induction ceremony, Speaker Boehner was given a commemorative plaque engraved with a 1963 image of White Castle’s Cincinnati restaurant #11, where he frequented as a young boy.” They didn’t give out those plaques to just anyone; Boehner is joined by luminaries such as Kal Penn, John Cho, and Alice Cooper. The rock god himself!

Boehner was in some respects just another middle-aged man trapped in a dead-end job, fending off challenges from younger, more energetic coworkers while cleaning up the messes of his less functional colleagues. Imagine being asked to manage a team that included both Steve Stockman and Louie Gohmert. You’d probably need a cigarette and a glass of merlot, too.

From a policy standpoint, Boehner was often woefully misguided. From a leadership standpoint, he was often flailing. In a few years, he will almost certainly make a very effective lobbyist for causes you don’t like. But if you accept the premise that the next speaker of the House will be—like Boehner—a conservative, anti-abortion, anti-spending Republican who doesn’t like Obama’s agenda and wants to do whatever he can to stop it, you just might learn to miss America’s Republican Dad.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate