Is the Refugee Crisis Fueling Europe’s Right-Wing Parties?

In Germany—the country most welcoming to the flood of immigrants—support for the nativist party is increasing.

<a href=http://www.apimages.com/metadata/Index/Germany-Migrants/2df7e8f2aa8940e691f461ddf60f47a7/17/0> Kerstin Joensson</a>/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Germany last week was filled with crowds of cheering volunteers who welcomed tens of thousands of refugees into Munich after long and sometimes violent journeys through the Balkans. But this week, there were signs that the mood of the country may already be shifting, with Germany’s right wing poised to take advantage of any discomfort with the presence of refugees.

A poll released on Tuesday by Bild, Germany’s largest tabloid, showed rising support for the right-wing, anti-immigrant party Alternative for Germany, or AfD. Earlier this month, 3 percent of the country backed the party, known for its nativist and anti-European Union stances. Now Support for AfD stands at 5.5 percent, just over the 5 percent threshold to earn seats in the Germany’s Parliament. The poll followed a week during which members of the Christian Social Union, the Bavarian sister party of Chancellor Angela Merkel’s center-right Christian Democratic Union, said publicly that the refugee situation was spiraling out of control.

“The situation in Germany is more tense than it is portrayed in most international commentaries,” Timo Lochocki of the German Marshall Fund, a US-German think tank, told Mother Jones. He pointed out that the government must now do the hard work of integrating refugees, including screening them to make sure their refugee status is valid, providing them with public money and housing, and cajoling state and local governments into welcoming the new arrivals. Above all, Germany has to find a way to slow the influx—and fast.

“The government stepped in and said, ‘This is a major challenge for Germany, however we have the means at our disposal to cope and this is going to be temporary,'” Lochocki said. “If the numbers don’t go down remarkably next year, the German voters will hold the governing Social Democrats (SPD) and the Conservatives (CDU/CSU) accountable for not living up to their announcements.”

That doesn’t mean a right-wing takeover is imminent. Merkel has publicly welcomed refugees to Germany as their numbers surged over the summer, and the German public has largely followed suit. Along with the images of Germans rushing to help out in Munich, polls conducted last week showed strong support among the German public for accepting large numbers of refugees.

And neither Alternative for Germany nor the NPD, Germany’s neo-Nazi party, is particularly powerful. Both have come out against accepting refugees, with AfD proposing tougher controls on immigrants last week and NPD members taking part in controversial anti-immigrant marches in various German cities. Both have higher levels of support in parts of former East Germany, where far-right politics are more popular, but neither party has ever won enough votes to make it into Parliament—though that could change.

That contrasts sharply to much of the rest of Europe, where right-wing parties from France’s National Front to Greece’s Golden Dawn are important players. In liberal Sweden, the refugee crisis has fueled support for the country’s anti-immigrant party, which has gained a huge amount of support, according to a poll taken last month. Hungary, where the xenophobic Jobbik party is the third largest in the legislature, helped fuel the current refugee crisis by building a fence to block refugees and passing tight restrictions on those caught in the country. Denmark, another prominent opponent of taking more refugees, saw the anti-immigrant Danish People’s Party ride the refugee issue to a major victory in elections just three months ago. Germany could find itself in a similar situation if the country’s pro-immigrant mood changes.

One sign of a potential shift came on Sunday. After a summer of welcoming refugees, denouncing nativist violence, and even suspending EU regulations to allow all Syrians to apply for refugee status in Germany, Merkel’s government abruptly closed its border with Austria in an attempt to stem the daily flow of thousands of refugees into southern Germany. The website of Der Spiegel described the border closure as “the end of the summer fairy tale.” The Washington Post also reported on Thursday that the German government may introduce a law that would streamline deportations, cut benefits, and possibly roll back Merkel’s declaration that all Syrian refugees were welcome to apply for asylum in Germany despite EU rules to the contrary.

A solution is still a long way off. By closing its border, Germany also hoped to pressure the European Union into distributing refugees more evenly across Europe. EU members instead have failed to agree on adopting even an optional quota system during meetings this week.

“They haven’t basically planned for this,” Lochocki said of the German government. “They might have already proposed something they can’t deliver on. And then, well, this opens the window of opportunity” for the right wing.

Max J. Rosenthal is reporting from Berlin as part of the Arthur F. Burns Fellowship, a two-month reporting program in Germany run by the International Center for Journalists.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate