Los Angeles Unveils a New Plan to Help the Homeless—and It Just Might Work

“We all understand the urgency that this situation requires, and what is at stake.”

Torrance Moore prepares cardboard bedding while setting up a tent on the sidewalk in LA's skid row.Jae C. Hong/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Tucked behind clusters of ritzy downtown high-rises, Los Angeles’ skid row is famous for its countless tents and makeshift shelters. They house thousands of the city’s homeless, and the numbers have been increasing for years: According to one recent estimate, 13,000 Angelenos become homeless each month.

Amid continued criticism over the city’s failure to address the problem, on Tuesday the LA City Council declared a state of emergency and Mayor Eric Garcetti announced his support for a new City Council proposal that will provide $100 million for homeless services, increase annual funds for programs that provide housing and maintain housing affordability, and focus on solutions like permanent supportive housing and rental subsidies.

“We all understand the urgency that this situation requires, and what is at stake,” Garcetti said in a statement. He added that an additional $13 million in emergency funding would be allocated immediately, primarily in the form of housing subsidies for veterans and nonchronically homeless people who aren’t in need of additional services. Garcetti also called for an annual $100 million to “establish an institutional foundation” that would fund permanent housing for the homeless.

While it’s still unclear how the city will spend the $100 million for homeless services, or how the plan will be implemented, Garcetti said the city will invest in affordable housing, enforce June’s minimum-wage increase to $15 an hour, and launch a new, separately funded program—the Los Angeles Regional Initiative for Social Enterprise (LA:RISE)—that will help people who have historically struggled to gain employment, including those who were previously incarcerated, get jobs.

San Jose has been able to cut homelessness by 15 percent over the past two years by dedicating more funds to initiatives like permanent supportive housing.

Even if Los Angeles is able to scale up funding and provide more services for the homeless, tackling housing affordability has become a notoriously difficult problem. As I reported earlier this year, many cities are struggling to keep up with rising rents.

When people were forced out of the housing market during the recession, explained Elina Bravve of the National Low Income Housing Coalition, higher-income renters drove up demand and price. “That puts a lot of pressure on the low-income market,” she told me. “It is definitely a problem that will continue over the next few decades.”

Still, many of the strategies Garcetti said he hopes to deploy have proven track records. San Jose, California—which has one of the nation’s largest homeless populations—has been able to cut homelessness by 15 percent over the past two years by dedicating more funds to initiatives like permanent supportive housing and exploring novel solutions to create transitional housing units, including temporary tiny homes. And as Scott Carrier wrote in a Mother Jones cover story earlier this year, the Housing First model helped Utah all but eliminate homelessness and has the potential to save millions in taxpayer dollars that would be otherwise spent on emergency health care and the incarceration of chronically homeless people.

“These investments reinforce an American ideal that is central to our collective identity and a sense of dignity, hope, and belonging,” Garcetti said, “that every person should have an equal opportunity to achieve success and prosperity through hard work, determination, and initiative.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate