Congressional Minority Representatives to DOJ: Gun Control in Our Communities Matters Too

Gun deaths “remain frustratingly common across the country, especially in communities of color,”

US Attorney General Loretta Lynch.Stefan Wermuth/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A group of nearly 40 representatives, from the Congressional Black, Hispanic, and Asian Pacific American Caucuses, wrote to Attorney General Loretta Lynch Wednesday morning, requesting that the Department of Justice do more to address gun violence in minority communities across the country.

“We believe the administration, working with its state and local partners, should examine new policies to reduce gun violence that can be implemented without the need for legislative action,” the group wrote. “Specifically, we strongly encourage your Department to consider stronger enforcement efforts directed at the relatively small number of dishonest dealers who sell the vast majority of firearms used in crimes.”

The letter, spearheaded by Reps. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and Robin Kelly (D-Ill.), asks for a meeting with Lynch to talk about various policy proposals, and blames Congressional Republican leadership for blocking progress on “common sense legislation” that they say could address gun violence in US communities. One of those proposals is the “Good Neighbor” code of conduct resolution introduced by Gallego last month (the bill is currently stalled  in the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security and Terrorism). That resolution calls on the Attorney General to establish a voluntary system in which gun dealers would be urged to maintain a trained workforce that understands all current gun laws, would notify law enforcement of suspected so-called “straw” purchasers, and ensure that a full background check be performed before a gun is sold. Participating gun dealers would then get a certification from the Attorney General’s office, and a list of “Good Neighbor” certified gun dealers would be posted online.

Additionally, Gallego’s resolution calls on the Attorney General’s office to improve the accuracy of firearms trace data, and to do more to identify licensed dealers whose guns disproportionately end up being used in crimes. According to Gallego, 5 percent of gun dealers supply nearly 90 percent of guns that police recover.

Lynch’s office couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.

Gun deaths “remain frustratingly common across the country, especially in communities of color,” the representatives note, citing statistics that point to the overrepresentation of minorities as victims of gun violence. “African Americans represent 13 percent of the U.S. population but constitute fully 55 percent of all gun homicide victims,” they wrote. “Similarly, even though Latinos are less likely than whites or African Americans to own guns, they are nevertheless disproportionately likely to be victimized in gun-related crimes.”

Others have also suggested that gun control activists have fallen short in addressing the specific needs of minority communities. City Lab’s Brentin Mock pointed out on Tuesday that gun control groups, many of which are majority-white, have not formed alliances with groups such as Black Lives Matter, primarily because they have suggested that minority communities have not done enough to address intra-group crime. “As if it needed repeating, black people don’t kill people because they’re black, and black people are not victimized by gun violence because they’re black,” Mock wrote. “The prevalence of guns held legally and illegally in high-crime areas in place like Chicago and New Orleans owes more to segregation and cities’ unimaginative ways of dealing with inherited poverty.”

Read the full letter below:

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate