Can This Gay GOP Arizona Sheriff Win a Congressional Seat?

Described as a “self-obsessed camera hog,” this sheriff was also accused in his first run of trying to deport his former lover.

Sheriff Paul Babeu speaks to the press gathered in July 2014 in Oracle, Arizona, approximately 50 miles from Tucson. He discussed his concerns over the expected arrival of a few dozen unaccompanied minors of Central American origin.Will Seberger/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Paul Babeu, the strident Republican, anti-illegal-immigration Arizona sheriff perhaps best known for allegedly threatening to deport his gay, immigrant ex-lover, announced Monday that he’s running for Congress.*

In 2008, Babeu was elected sheriff of Pinal County, a large county bordering the southeast portion of the Phoenix metro area. A statement released on his website Monday, decrying “President Obama’s unconstitutional power grabs” and pointing out his anti-illegal immigration bona fides, announced his plans to win the 1st Congressional District seat being vacated by Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick, a Democrat who is running for US Senate. 

“I’ve spent seven years fighting Washington’s inaction and now it’s time to bring the fight directly to our nation’s capital,” Babeu said. “I will work tirelessly to protect the residents of rural Arizona, shrink the federal government, overturn Obamacare and guard against attacks on the 2nd Amendment.”

Babeu will be running for a seat in 2016—after unsuccessfully trying to win the same post in 2012. At the time, Babeu was a rising GOP star known for his tough talk on illegal immigration. But then his former boyfriend, Jose Orozco who was an immigrant from Mexico, told the Phoenix New Times that Babeu’s attorney threatened to start deportation proceedings against Orozco unless he signed an agreement that would prevent him from discussing their years-long relationship. Orozco and his attorney instead went to the New Times and reported the alleged threat. In reporting that story, the paper discovered that the sheriff had “posted lewd photos of himself” on dating websites and “e-mailed photos of his erect penis and selfies in his underwear” to men he’d met online.

The day after the story was published, Babeu held a press conference and acknowledged that he was gay, but he denied threatening Orozco. Babeu claimed that Orozco was a jilted lover who was mad that the relationship ended and had illegally accessed his campaign and other online accounts. He didn’t deny the veracity of the photos, and said his personal life wasn’t anybody’s business.

A subsequent investigation by the state’s attorney general cleared him of any wrongdoing.

Since then, Babeu has remained sheriff of Pinal County and has found new ways to be controversial. In 2014, he told a crowd at a Republican political event that a group of Central American children caught at the US-Mexico border would be bused to a facility north of Tucson, Arizona. Babeu’s actions, as described in a scathing Arizona Republic editorial, caused “totally predictable chaos” when protesters descended on the site and ended up surrounding two buses carrying local children headed to a YMCA day camp. Babeu showed up at the site and said he was the peacemaker, according to the paper.

The paper described the sheriff as “a self-obsessed camera hog” and slammed him for what he did.

Think of the pyromaniac who torches his own house, then throws himself on the mercy of the court as a homeless waif. According to one protest organizer, Babeu told her “the only way to stop this was for our community and the area to organize.” And so he did, effectively, organize and manipulate the incident. Then he sent out a host of Pinal County deputies to maintain some semblance of the peace he single-handedly threatened. That’s gall.

Babeu will be running in an already crowded GOP primary, facing off against former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett and Gary Kiehne, an Arizona businessman with experience in oil and ranching.

Clarification: An earlier version of this article misstated Orozco’s immigration status. It’s unclear whether he was in the country legally or illegally.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate