Flush With Cash, Ted Cruz Super-PACs Fight Over Spending

The outside group and the campaign aren’t allowed to coordinate, but they have close ties.

Nati Harnik/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In dollar terms, Ted Cruz is doing quite well in the dark-money game that has come to dominate presidential politics. Four super-PACs supporting the US senator from Texas have raised a total of $38 million—more than the super-PACs backing any other Republican presidential candidate except for Jeb Bush.

But Cruz’s campaign has grown frustrated that the groups—called Keep the Promise PAC, Keep the Promise I, Keep the Promise II, and Keep the Promise III—haven’t been spending that whopping sum to promote Cruz. They’ve run just one TV ad, on a single night in September, and haven’t bought any further TV ad time. By contrast, outside groups backing Bush, Marco Rubio, John Kasich, and even lower-tier candidates such as Bobby Jindal and Chris Christie have already spent millions on ads for them. Under federal law, the campaign can’t coordinate with the super-PACs to urge them to run the pro-Cruz ads it wants to see.

 

Enter Courageous Conservatives PAC. The newest pro-Cruz super-PAC aims to prod the other groups into running ads, and to show them what types of messages to convey. To do this, the group released a radio ad last week in which it slammed emerging front-runner Rubio and touted Cruz. “We all loved how Marco Rubio took apart Jeb Bush in the debate,” the narrator says. “Wasn’t it great? But what’s Rubio ever done? Other than his Gang of Eight amnesty bill, can anyone think of anything Marco Rubio’s ever done?”

Rick Shaftan, a spokesman for the group, makes no secret of Courageous Conservatives PAC’s intentions toward the other super-PACs backing Cruz. “What we’re aiming to do is to get Keep the Promise I, II, and III to make some aggressive ads that people will want to share on social media like they do with our ads,” he says. One of the four groups, Keep the Promise I, finally began spending money when it put out eight radio spots last week, which Shaftan calls “just horrible” and “so weak” that voters won’t listen to them.

While this new super-PAC, like the others, cannot coordinate with the Cruz campaign, it has a clear link to Cruz’s campaign manager, Kansas City-based strategist Jeff Roe, whose reputation for running nasty campaigns in Missouri goes back more than a decade. 

The treasurer of the new pro-Cruz group is James C. Thomas III, a Kansas City lawyer and close associate of Roe’s. The treasurer is responsible for registering the group and handling its legal issues and paperwork. Thomas often acts as treasurer for groups that Roe uses for his clients in Missouri.

Earlier this year, Thomas registered the group Citizens for Fairness in Missouri, which Roe used as a front group in his work for Missouri gubernatorial candidate Catherine Hanaway. The group ran an attack ad against Hanaway’s opponent, Tom Schweich, who later committed suicide, bringing scrutiny on Roe, the ad, and his aggressive campaign tactics. Thomas has also served as treasurer of five super-PACs or campaign committees at the federal level before Courageous Conservatives. Mother Jones found that four of those five efforts were tied to Roe or his firm, Axiom Strategies.

Shaftan told Mother Jones he was unaware of Roe’s connection to Thomas, adding that Thomas does the legal paperwork for multiple groups and works with many people. He declined to name anyone else involved with Courageous Conservatives PAC except to describe them as “people who want to see Ted Cruz elected and want to make sure there are good ads to back him up.”

The group has spent about $25,000 thus far, and Shaftan expects to release more ads this week or early next week. In response to questions about the Keep the Promise super-PACs and the new group, a spokeswoman for Cruz responded, “We do not coordinate with them.”

 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate