Obama Has Failed to Live Up to Promises on Campaign Finance, Progressive Group Charges

Despite his rhetoric on the issue, advocates say he’s fallen short on eight counts.

Rex Features/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


President Barack Obama has been a vocal critic of the unraveling of campaign finance regulations by conservatives in government. But on Tuesday, a group led by several prominent liberals assailed the president’s record on the issue, arguing that he has done little to address the situation and has, in several key areas, made things worse.

Rootstrikers, a nonprofit that advocates for campaign finance reform, released a report Tuesday morning criticizing Obama’s record. The group is ostensibly nonpartisan, but was founded by former Democratic presidential candidate Lawrence Lessig and Howard Dean’s former campaign manager, Joe Trippi. The report notes Obama’s history of criticizing the Citizens United Supreme Court decision, which ushered in the current era of unlimited political donations, including his State of the Union speech that called out of the conservative justices who issued the ruling. But it faults him on eight specific points where he has either failed to act or actively helped unwind campaign finance regulations further.

Kurt Walters, campaign manager for Rootstrikers, said Obama will have a legacy of failure on campaign finance, and it will be his own fault.

“It’s cynical even by Washington, DC, standards,” Walters said in a statement to Mother Jones. “Obama has said for six years that he’s outraged at Citizens United but still hasn’t bothered to do anything combating the decision’s effects.”

The eight strikes against Obama’s record, according to Rootstrikers, are:

  • He has not issued an executive order requiring federal contractors to disclose their political contributions, a change that activists have clamored for in recent years.
  • Obama’s appointee for chairwoman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Mary Jo White, killed a proposal to issue a rule requiring publicly traded companies to disclose their political contributions.
  • Obama’s appointee for chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Tom Wheeler, stated that forcing further disclosure of who pays for political ads was “not a priority”.
  • Despite claims from conservatives that Obama has used the IRS to persecute activists on the right, Obama’s appointee for IRS director has delayed implementation of rules clarifying the role that politically active nonprofits can play in elections.
  • With the FEC completely deadlocked, Obama could appoint new members to replace the five commissioners (of a total six positions) whose terms have expired. While there are supposed to be three Democratic and three Republican commissioners, campaign reform activists have long asked Obama to select commissioners who will work across the aisle.
  • Obama broke at least three campaign promises related to campaign finance: He has not advocated for public financing, has allowed associates to fundraise for super-PACs, and has allowed corporate contributions to his second inaugural committee.
  • He signed multiple pieces of legislation that removed campaign finance regulations, including the 2014 “Cromnibus” spending legislation, which had provisions to raise the limits on the amount big donors could give to political parties, and legislation to do away with public financing of presidential conventions.
  • He has dodged questions from the press about dark money.

The report is part of a larger campaign by Rootstrikers, including the creation of the website presidentobamaslegacy.org, which features a petition to the White House that has collected more than 102,000 signatures.

A full copy of the report can be found here.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate