The 6 Best Moments of the Democratic Debate

Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton take the gloves off.

Stephen B. Morton/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


With Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders neck and neck in the polls, the Democratic candidates met, along with former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, for the final debate before Iowa’s caucuses on February 1. Like the two prior debates, this one was held on a weekend night—likely diminishing the number of primary voters who tuned in.

Clinton and Sanders, who have traded attacks over the last several weeks on gun control, health care, and Wall Street reform, had a chance to spar in person. While the debate never turned nasty, it was certainly heated.

Hillary rips into Bernie over gun control.

Right off the bat, the moderators asked Sanders about one of the most contentious issues of the Democratic primary: gun control. Sanders defended himself against Clinton’s attacks over his record on gun control. “I have a D-minus voting record from the NRA,” Sanders said in response to accusations that his votes align with the National Rifle Association. “It was in 1988, there were three candidates running for Congress in the state of Vermont, I stood up to the gun lobby and came out and maintained the position that in this country we should not be selling military style assault weapons.”

Clinton responded by repeating her campaign’s attacks against his gun record, saying that Sanders “has voted with the NRA, with the gun lobby numerous times. He voted against the Brady Bill five times. He voted for what we call, the Charleston Loophole. He voted for immunity from gun makers and sellers which the NRA said, ‘was the most important piece of gun legislation in 20 years.'”

Hillary and Bernie battle over health care.

After a week of exchanging fire over health care, Clinton and Sanders finally faced off over the issue in person. Sanders, who released a health care plan hours before Sunday night’s debate, called for a “Medicare-for-all” system while Clinton argued that Democrats should focus on improving the Affordable Care Act instead of embarking on another major debate over health care.

“That is nonsense,” Sanders said at one point, growing noticeably irked after Clinton suggested that his push for single-payer health insurance is the same as a rollback of Obamacare.

Sanders attacks Clinton over Goldman Sachs speaking fees.

Sanders didn’t flinch when the moderators asked about the main difference between how he and Clinton would approach Wall Street. “The first difference is I don’t take money from big banks,” he said. “I don’t get personal speaking fees from Goldman Sachs.” From there, he dove into policy details, citing his enthusiasm for busting up the largest financial institutions and “21st century Glass-Steagall legislation” to separate commercial and investment banking.

Sanders returned to the topic later in the evening. “Secretary Clinton—and you’re not the only one, so I don’t mean to just point the finger at you, you’ve received over $600,000 in speaking fees from Goldman Sachs in one year,” he said.

Sanders calls for Justice Department investigations when anyone dies “in police custody.”

Sanders extended his criminal justice agenda Sunday evening with an ambitious new proposal, calling for the federal government to get involved whenever someone dies in police custody—an occurrence that has been highlighted by the recent deaths of Sandra Bland in Texas and Freddie Gray in Baltimore. “Whenever anybody in this country is killed while in police custody, it should automatically trigger a U.S. attorney general’s investigation,” Sanders said.

Clinton describes her relationship with Vladimir Putin.

During her time as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton famously spearheaded the Obama administration’s efforts to “reset” relations with Russia. But, since these overtures, Russian President Vladimir Putin has become increasingly bellicose and aggressive on the international stage. How would Clinton now describe her relationship with the Russian leader? “It’s, um, interesting,” Clinton said after a long pause, clearly choosing her words carefully.

Clinton calls attention to the crisis in Flint, Michigan.

In her closing remarks, Clinton raised the plight of the people of Flint, Michigan—where toxic levels of lead in the city’s drinking water has created a state of emergency—as an example of the kind of problem she wants to solve as president.

“Every single American should be outraged,” she declared. “We’ve had a city in the United States of America, which the population is poor in many ways and majority African American, has been bathing and drinking lead-contaminated water. And the governor of that state acted as if he didn’t really care.” Clinton speculated that if children in a rich suburb of Detroit were exposed to contaminated water, the reaction would have been different. Clinton went on to discuss how she dispatched one of her campaign operatives to Flint “to see what I could to help.” 

Sanders, who spoke last, also addressed the crisis in Flint. “I demanded the resignation of the governor,” he said, calling Republican Gov. Rick Snyder a man who “should not stay in power.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate