Eight Years Later, Obama Finally Moves to Shut Down Guantanamo

But the plan stands little chance of getting through Congress.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Casting the move as a moral imperative, President Barack Obama announced a plan on Tuesday to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay at long last and bring its remaining detainees to prisons in the United States.

“For many years it’s been clear that the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay does not advance our national security,” Obama said in an announcement from the Oval Office on Tuesday. “It undermines it. It undermines our standing in the world. It is viewed as a stain on our broader record of upholding the highest standards of rule of law.”

Shutting down the Guantanamo prison was a major campaign promise during Obama’s first White House run in 2008. But the facility has remained open, drawing widespread criticism from human rights groups, foreign governments, and many members of Obama’s own party. While both Obama and former President George W. Bush have released or transferred many former detainees to the custody of other countries, 91 inmates still remain at the prison.

Obama’s plan would transfer another 35 of those inmates, leaving 56 prisoners who are too dangerous to be sent to other countries. Those inmates would be transferred to facilities in the United States and continue to go through trials by the military commissions that are hearing their cases in Cuba.

Obama described the plan not only as a moral and diplomatic boost but also as a way to dramatically cut the cost of housing terrorists. According to the written plan submitted to Congress, the government spent $445 million to run the Guantanamo prison last year. Moving the remaining inmates to the United States “would lower costs by between $140 million and $180 million annually, as compared to [fiscal year] 2015 Guantanamo operations costs,” the report stated.

Obama’s announcement pinned the blame for the long delay in closing the prison on Republicans in Congress, claiming they had supported closure while George W. Bush was in office but then reversed course to score political points. “Unfortunately, during that period where we were putting the pieces in place to close [Guantanamo], what had previously been bipartisan support suddenly became a partisan issue,” Obama said.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) immediately pushed back, pointing out that current law prohibits the government from bringing Guantanamo prisoners to the United States or spending funds to prepare prisons in case they’re brought to the country. “This isn’t a case where the president can even try to justify the use of some pen-and-phone strategy by claiming Congress failed to act,” he said in a speech on the Senate floor. “To the contrary, Congress acted over and over and over again in a bipartisan way to reject the president’s desire to transfer dangerous terrorists to communities here in the United States.” Provisions about Guantanamo have been passed as part of National Defense Authorization Acts, the large yearly laws that lay out military spending and policy.

Obama’s plan currently has little chance of passing Congress, and even White House spokesman Josh Earnest said on Monday that he was “not confident” lawmakers would approve the plan, according to the New York Times. Despite this final effort, it remains unlikely that Obama will be able to fulfill one of the central promises that he rode to the presidency.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate