Eight Years Later, Obama Finally Moves to Shut Down Guantanamo

But the plan stands little chance of getting through Congress.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Casting the move as a moral imperative, President Barack Obama announced a plan on Tuesday to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay at long last and bring its remaining detainees to prisons in the United States.

“For many years it’s been clear that the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay does not advance our national security,” Obama said in an announcement from the Oval Office on Tuesday. “It undermines it. It undermines our standing in the world. It is viewed as a stain on our broader record of upholding the highest standards of rule of law.”

Shutting down the Guantanamo prison was a major campaign promise during Obama’s first White House run in 2008. But the facility has remained open, drawing widespread criticism from human rights groups, foreign governments, and many members of Obama’s own party. While both Obama and former President George W. Bush have released or transferred many former detainees to the custody of other countries, 91 inmates still remain at the prison.

Obama’s plan would transfer another 35 of those inmates, leaving 56 prisoners who are too dangerous to be sent to other countries. Those inmates would be transferred to facilities in the United States and continue to go through trials by the military commissions that are hearing their cases in Cuba.

Obama described the plan not only as a moral and diplomatic boost but also as a way to dramatically cut the cost of housing terrorists. According to the written plan submitted to Congress, the government spent $445 million to run the Guantanamo prison last year. Moving the remaining inmates to the United States “would lower costs by between $140 million and $180 million annually, as compared to [fiscal year] 2015 Guantanamo operations costs,” the report stated.

Obama’s announcement pinned the blame for the long delay in closing the prison on Republicans in Congress, claiming they had supported closure while George W. Bush was in office but then reversed course to score political points. “Unfortunately, during that period where we were putting the pieces in place to close [Guantanamo], what had previously been bipartisan support suddenly became a partisan issue,” Obama said.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) immediately pushed back, pointing out that current law prohibits the government from bringing Guantanamo prisoners to the United States or spending funds to prepare prisons in case they’re brought to the country. “This isn’t a case where the president can even try to justify the use of some pen-and-phone strategy by claiming Congress failed to act,” he said in a speech on the Senate floor. “To the contrary, Congress acted over and over and over again in a bipartisan way to reject the president’s desire to transfer dangerous terrorists to communities here in the United States.” Provisions about Guantanamo have been passed as part of National Defense Authorization Acts, the large yearly laws that lay out military spending and policy.

Obama’s plan currently has little chance of passing Congress, and even White House spokesman Josh Earnest said on Monday that he was “not confident” lawmakers would approve the plan, according to the New York Times. Despite this final effort, it remains unlikely that Obama will be able to fulfill one of the central promises that he rode to the presidency.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate