The Time Trump Called One of His Biggest Celebrity Supporters a Liar

The GOP front-runner once claimed Omarosa, his top media champion, couldn’t be trusted.

Chuck Burton/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Donald Trump doesn’t have a lot of surrogates in the media. There are few officials or notables who go on television or talk to reporters on behalf of the wall-loving, Muslim-banning tycoon now leading the Republican presidential race. But one of his most prominent advocates—especially on cable television—is Omarosa Manigault-Stallworth. Known widely by her first name alone, Omarosa was a participant on the initial season of Trump’s show, The Apprentice, which aired in 2004, and the television-watching public quickly developed a hate-affair with her, as she became perceived as a no-good, lying backstabber. A headline from the time: “Omarosa: Can a Pathological Liar Find Success on TV?” In subsequent years, she was routinely described as one of the top reality-show villains of all time.

These days, Omarosa is playing a role in Trump’s latest reality show. She often appears on television to defend and praise the mogul. Last November, when Trump met with black pastors, she was in the room and afterward went on television to say, “It was actually a very good meeting. I thought it was really brave of him to just sit there and take the tough questions.” After Fox News host Megyn Kelly, while moderating a presidential debate, asked Trump a pointed question about derogatory comments he made regarding women, Omarosa rushed to his rescue on CNN and slammed Kelly for engaging in the “lowest form of journalism.” While appearing on a Fox Business Network segment about Trump, she lashed out at a Trump critic, whom she said had “big boobs.” On MSNBC last week—after a black protester was sucker-punched at a Trump event—Omarosa said demonstrators at Trump rallies “get what’s coming to [them].”

In December, Omarosa explained her Trump support to talk show host Steve Harvey: “I know him as a friend, as a mentor, as a father. You all are getting to know him as a candidate. That’s the way you know him. I know him differently. And I will continue to be a friend to Donald Trump throughout this entire journey for him, and hopefully he gets exactly what he wants.”

The respect may not be mutual—or, at least, it wasn’t 12 years ago. In a 2004 interview with Playboy, Trump offered a harsh assessment of Omarosa, saying that she had indeed lied on The Apprentice and that he would be reluctant to give her a job reference for a business position. Here’s the exchange: 

Omarosa became one of the great villains in the history of reality TV. She lied, she backstabbed, she even “misplaced” Jessica Simpson. How much of that was scripted?

Honestly, none of it. We chose her over 215,000 applicants, but I didn’t know until midway through the show that she would be such a villain. I got along with her very well, but she was difficult for people to handle. I realized we had something when people like my dear friend Regis Philbin started asking me if she was too good to be true, if we’d concocted her in some way. It was all 100 percent Omarosa. I couldn’t believe she was lying on camera like she was. She’s got a problem or something.

Would you serve as a job reference if she asked?
It would depend on what kind of job it is.

The chief executive of a small company?
No, I really don’t think so. But I might serve as a reference for her to be on a soap opera, because I think she’d be terrific at it. She’s wonderful on TV, and she gets ratings. I just wouldn’t necessarily want her running my church.

Omarosa has regularly identified herself as a “surrogate” for the Trump campaign. Yet Hope Hicks, Trump’s spokeswoman, says Omaraosa “doesn’t represent the campaign in an official capacity.” Omarosa did not respond to a request for comment.

Whatever the relationship with the Trump campaign, perhaps from now on, when Omarosa does show support for Trump, it should be noted that Trump himself once said she couldn’t be trusted.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate