Hillary Clinton Wins Kentucky Primary, Just Barely

The Sanders camp says they won’t demand a recount.

Seth Wenig/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Hillary Clinton pulled off a narrow victory in Kentucky Tuesday night, beating Sanders by just a few thousand votes. Still, the victory ends a rough patch after losses in Indiana and West Virginia earlier this month. By winning Kentucky, the Clinton campaign can make the case that the former secretary of state can appeal to working-class white voters who have been drawn to both Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders.

With 99 percent of precincts reporting, Clinton had won 46.8 percent of the vote to 46.3 percent for Sanders. But the state was too close to call for hours after the polls closed.

Kentucky was once Clinton-friendly territory; Bill Clinton won the state in 1992 and 1996, and the Clintons have strong relationships with Democrats in the state going back to the 1990s. In 2008, Clinton won the Kentucky primary between her and then-Sen. Barack Obama by more than 30 points. But this year, Sanders has been successful at peeling away working-class white voters. And Clinton’s remark at an Ohio town hall back in March promising to “put a lot of coal companies and coal miners out of business” has gotten a lot of play in Kentucky and other states where the declining coal industry has put many out of work. Just last week, Sanders won West Virginia by a wide margin despite the fact that Clinton won that state overwhelmingly in her primary against Obama eight years ago.

Not wanting to see Kentucky go the way of West Virginia, the Clinton campaign worked hard to keep Kentucky in the former secretary’s column. Even though a loss in Kentucky would not likely make a meaningful difference in the delegate math that determines the nominee, Clinton’s campaign did not take anything for granted. According to Politico, Clinton or her husband appeared in 13 campaign events in Kentucky over the past 10 days and the campaign bought additional ads in the final week leading up to the primary.

But there were a few factors working in Clinton’s favor in Kentucky that she did not have in West Virginia. First, the state’s primary is closed, meaning that only registered Democrats can participate—Sanders has tended to win when independents can vote in the primary. The second factor is Clinton’s strong base of support among African Americans. Kentucky has a larger black population—about 8 percent—than West Virginia and the other mostly-white states where Sanders has performed well.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate