Reality Show King Mark Burnett Says He’s Not Helping Donald Trump

GOP sources say he is working on the convention; he denies it.

Danny Moloshok/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Two weeks ago, Mother Jones received a tip: Mark Burnett, the reality television king, was helping Donald Trump to spiff up the GOP convention. Two Republican consultants told us that Burnett, the British-born creator of Survivor, had been enlisted to work on various show-biz aspects of the Republican shindig. “He’s been in and out” of the convention planning, says a third Republican operative. “Not sure if he’s in the final.”

Burnett’s participation would make a certain sense, for he produced The Apprentice, the television show that turned Trump, the presumptive GOP nominee, into a small-screen star. Trump has talked publicly about staging the coming GOP gathering in Cleveland as an entertainment extravaganza. And Burnett sure knows how to create a television hit. He has produced The Voice, Shark Tank, and many other shows, including various awards shows.

Yet when Mother Jones contacted Burnett’s spokeswoman, she said that Burnett was not working on the convention where Trump will be crowned. She noted that she had checked with Burnett and that he was not involved. Then this week, the New York Post, citing one source, said that Burnett had indeed been recruited by Trump for the event and that the convention would present Melania Trump as the new Jackie Kennedy. 

Following the New York Post article, Burnett’s rep checked again with the mega-producer and subsequently told Mother Jones that Burnett has nothing to do with the GOP convention.

Despite Burnett’s entertainment partnership with Trump, his participation in the convention would be surprising, for in recent years, he and wife, actress and producer Roma Downey, have been financial supporters of Democrats.

In 2008, Burnett and Downey each gave the maximum donation permissible to Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. After Obama won the White House, Burnett donated a hefty $30,400 to the Democratic National Committee. In the previous election cycle, Downey, who starred in the television show Touched by an Angel, supported John Kerry’s presidential bid. In 2013, Burnett gave $5,200 to Alison Grimes, a Democrat who was challenging Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell. Last September, Downey sent a donation to Kathleen Matthews, a Democrat (and the wife of MSNBC’s Chris Matthews) who was running for a congressional seat in suburban Maryland outside of Washington, DC.

Their political donations seem standard for a Hollywood couple. There is no record of either donating to a national Republican candidate in the past two decades.

Burnett worked with Trump on The Apprentice, but would he now want to tie his brand to Trump’s? These days, he and Downey are launching their big-budget remake of Ben-Hur, which will hit theaters in August. At a recent screening of the movie—which was held after the horrific mass-shooting at the gay nightclub in Orlando—Downey said, “There’s things clearly happening in the world and we put this film together to impact culture with the message of love and forgiveness and reconciliation and that’s needed now more than ever.” She added, “I think that this film at this time hopefully can offer some type of balm for the hurting world that we live in.”

The last time Burnett and Downey found themselves in a political imbroglio, they expressed support for Obama. In 2013, the History Channel aired a 10-hour miniseries based on the Bible that was produced by Burnett and Downey, and various observers pointed out that the actor portraying Satan on the series bore a striking resemblance to Obama. In response, Downey put out a statement asserting this was hogwash, noting, “Both Mark and I have nothing but respect and love [for] our president, who is a fellow Christian.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate