“We Shouldn’t Have Assault Weapons Available”

A top White House advisor lays out Obama’s new line on gun control.

White House Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett speaks with retired judge LaDoris Cordell at the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco. Courtesy of <a href=http://www.nortonbasu.com/>Norton Basu</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It’s all Democratic hands on deck in the gun control fight.

As House Democrats staged a sit-in on the House floor Wednesday evening, White House Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett did her part in an appearance before San Francisco’s Commonwealth Club.

“It’s our view that we shouldn’t have assault weapons available,” she said. “They’re really dangerous. They really are common-sense reforms that we’ve been asking for.”

Beyond pushing the White House’s goal of banning assault weapons, Jarrett urged expanding background checks and encouraged people make their voices heard.* She lauded Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) for initiating the sit-in.

“He has just had enough, and he doesn’t know what else to do other than just sit there and demonstrate until he can get his colleagues on the Republican side of the House to come and just do their jobs,” she said.

Since the mass shooting in Orlando, legislators supporting gun-control have been busy. It started last week when Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) filibustered the Senate for almost 15 hours and demanded a vote on gun-control legislation. That brought votes on four proposals in a special Senate session Monday night, but the measures failed.

Then, Rep. Lewis led a sit-in on Wednesday, demanding a vote on a bill that would prevent people on a no-fly targeting terrorists list from purchasing firearms. “Sometimes you have to do something out of the ordinary; sometimes you have to make a way out of no way,” Lewis said. “We have been too quiet for too long.”

Earlier this week, Jarrett hosted a conference call with signers of a White House petition to ban the AR-15 and outlined several other administration initiatives, including looking into smart gun technology and funding research on gun homicides by the Centers for Disease Control. (An NRA-backed measure banned federal funding for such research in the 1990s.)

On Wednesday night Jarrett said it will take a lot for gun control advocates to beat the NRA.

“They have a lot of money and a lot of influence, and the only thing that’s going to be a counterbalance to that is truly you; it’s the American people,” Jarrett said. “When you care as much about keeping our children safe as the NRA does about making weapons available to every single person, that’s when change will happen.”

Clarification: While Jarrett noted people are encouraging their elected officials, she did not specifically urge them to do so.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate