July 15, 2016

Eric Garner’s Daughter Calls Obama Town Hall on Race Relations a “Farce”

Erica Garner, whose father was killed in a police encounter, said ABC News broke its promise to let her speak.

Erica Garner speaks at a 2015 memorial for Michael Brown. Raffe Lazarian/ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


A town hall with President Barack Obama on Thursday became embroiled in controversy when the daughter of Eric Garner, an unarmed black man killed during an encounter with New York police officers in 2014, claimed that she wasn’t allowed to ask the president a question after being promised she would have the opportunity.

ABC News broadcast the town hall on race relations on Thursday evening, but taped it earlier in the day. As taping finished, Garner’s oldest daughter, Erica, shouted that she had been “railroaded,” according to reports from USA Today and BuzzFeed.

Reporters were not allowed inside the taping, but several journalists outside of the studio confirmed that Garner was visibly upset.

Eric Garner died after New York City police officers confronted him for illegally selling cigarettes and used a chokehold to restrain him. Garner’s dying words, “I can’t breathe,” became a rallying cry for Black Lives Matter activists. In 2014, a grand jury declined to indict Daniel Pantaleo, the officer accused of causing Garner’s death.

Thursday’s presidential town hall comes just one week after two black men, Philando Castile and Alton Sterling, died in fatal encounters with law enforcement. The discussion also follows the fatal shooting of five police officers as they escorted a peaceful protest against police brutality through the streets of Dallas, Texas.

Several speakers had the chance to ask Obama questions during the town hall, including Diamond Reynolds, Castile’s girlfriend, who broadcast the aftermath of his shooting on Facebook Live, and Edward Flynn, the chief of the Milwaukee Police Department who came under fire in May after offering a list of “Four Simple Rules to Not Get Shot in Milwaukee.”

One of the tenser moments of the event came when Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick asked Obama to illuminate the White House in blue to show solidarity with police officers. Patrick challenged Obama’s previous comments about race and policing in America, asking the president to “not be too critical [of police] before the facts are known.” In an interview after the Dallas shooting, Patrick said that Black Lives Matter protesters were “hypocrites” for running away from the gunfire.

Obama countered that he already supports police officers and their right to due process. “We know what a tough job they have,” he said. “What I have said is that the data shows that there are disparities in how persons of color and whites are treated in the aggregate. We have to make sure that we don’t pretend that there aren’t potential problems in how communities and police interact.”

Erica Garner said that despite being promised by the network that she would be allowed to ask a question, the taping concluded before she could speak. She has been tweeting about her experience at the town hall for several hours, calling the ABC News special a “farce” and a “sham.”

A spokesperson for ABC told USA Today that while Garner was unable to speak during the broadcast, “the president spoke to several people after the event ended, including at length with Erica Garner.”

In a later tweet, Garner clarified that her frustration is not with Obama, but with the network for failing to follow through on its promise that she would be able to speak. In an interview with BuzzFeed, Garner also said that she was uncomfortable with the network’s decision to seat her next to the widows of Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos, two NYPD officers killed in an ambush that occurred days after the grand jury declined to indict Pantaleo in Eric Garner’s death.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate