Congress Wants to Make Sure You Don’t Have Coverage for This Medical Procedure

The House passed a bill protecting anti-abortion health professionals in California.

AP Photo/Cliff Owen

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The Conscience Protection Act, a bill that aims to circumvent a California Department of Managed Health Care requirement that insurance companies pay for elective abortions, passed yesterday in the US House of Representatives in a 245-182 vote, mostly along party lines.

The measure claims the 2014 California order violates the Hyde Amendment, which bars the use of Medicaid for abortion coverage, and the Weldon Amendment, which prevents federal funds from going to a state that discriminates against a “health care entity that does not provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.”

The bill prevents “penalizing or discriminating against a health care provider based on the provider’s refusal to be involved in, or provide coverage for, abortion.” It was introduced to the House by Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.), who is known for her anti-abortion stance and her role as a member of the controversial Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives, a House committee formed in the wake of last summer’s Planned Parenthood sting videos.

“We wouldn’t force nonsmokers to buy cigarettes for themselves or others. We wouldn’t force vegetarians to buy meat,” said Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.). “And we shouldn’t force those who oppose abortion to pay for abortions.”

In 2014, seven California insurance providers were notified by Gov. Jerry Brown’s administration that state law does not permit them to offer coverage that limits or excludes elective abortions from their covered services. The department sent letters asserting abortion was a “basic health care service” under California law. The action came after faculty members at Santa Clara University and Loyola Marymount University complained about the limitation in their insurance coverage.

The insurance companies ultimately complied, but anti-abortion advocates such as the Life Legal Defense Foundation, Cardinal Newman Society, and the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights filed a complaint with the department, citing the Weldon Amendment. The Office for Civil Rights at the Department of Health and Human Services considered the complaints for two years, ultimately deciding last month that the order did not violate a religious freedom law and could not apply to the California insurers because they were willing to provide abortion coverage to their other customers.

Democrats argued that in this measure, the GOP projected its religious values onto medical professionals, and that current law already protects physicians who have a moral conflict from having to perform an abortion. They are referring to a few Department of Health and Human Services provisions that offer such protection, including the Affordable Care Act, which states “no qualified health plan offered through an Exchange may discriminate against any individual health care provider or health care facility because of its unwillingness to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.” They argued the bill could open a window for a physician to withhold medical information that may motivate a patient to opt for an abortion.

“Congress needs to stop interfering in women’s health decisions once and for all,” said Diana DeGette (D-Colo.).

If the bill were to pass the Senate and reach President Barack Obama’s desk, he would likely veto it, since the Department of Health and Human Services has already found California’s policy to be constitutional.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate