July 8, 2016

Trump Touts Endorsement of a Man Who Was Convicted of Murder and Repeatedly Accused of Fraud

The GOP apparent nominee uses boxing promoter Don King as a reference.

Alex Menendez/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Donald Trump bragged at a rally on Wednesday night that he had secured the endorsement of legendary boxing promoter and wild-hair-enthusiast Don King. The sports impresario had recently published an editorial urging people vote for Trump. The article was a long and rambling rant. (“White women of America please accept and believe this unmitigated fact…that the evil corrupt way of life system of white supremacy and control is your deadly enemy…NOT DONALD J. TRUMP!!!.“) King insisted that voting for Trump was the only way to defeat the “evil corrupt rigged system which has been persecuting, lynching and murdering us for over 300 years.” And Trump told the crowd in Cincinnati, Ohio, that he hoped King would speak at the upcoming GOP convention:

You know who I just spoke to? Big Don King, big Don King. Big Don, greatest boxing promoter of all time. I said, “Don, I’d love you to speak at the convention, because you know what? You’ve beat the system.” And he’s a friend of mine.

Trump was animated as he boasted about King’s endorsement. But bringing King to the convention to testify in favor of Trump would be an odd move. Despite King’s successes in the world of boxing—he has promoted almost every major boxer in the last 50 years—he has a long checkered past, filled with allegations of fraud.

A short list of some of King’s sketchier moments includes:

  • In 1982, Muhammad Ali sued King for allegedly cheating him out of $1.1 million he was owed for fighting Larry Holmes. (Ali dropped the lawsuit after King paid him $50,000.)
  • In 1984, Larry Holmes sued King for allegedly cheating him out of several million dollars. (Holmes settled for $100,000.)
  • In 1987, boxer Tim Witherspoon sued King for $25 million, claiming King was violating anti-trust and racketeering laws. (Witherspoon and King settled out of court for $1 million.)
  • Investigations by Sports Illustrated and PBS’ Frontline linked Don King to mob figures, including John Gotti, and the Frontline feature alleged that King had bribed a judge in Cleveland in 1967 to help him beat a murder rap. (King was found guilty of second-degree murder for stomping an employee to death over a debt, but the charge was later reduced by the judge to non-negligent manslaughter, and King served nearly four years. He was pardoned by the governor of Ohio in 1983.)

King has had problems with another one of Trump’s celebrity endorsers: Mike Tyson. During some of the most tumultuous years of Tyson’s career, Trump “advised” the heavyweight champion, while King promoted his fights. In the end, Tyson sued King for $100 million, alleging King cheated him out of millions. The case was settled for $14 million.

So what kind of man does Tyson think King is? Here’s what Tyson said in the 2008 movie Tyson: “I got caught up with this other piece of shit Don King, who is a wretched, just a wretched, slimy, reptilian motherfucker…He’s just a bad man, a real bad man…He would kill his mother for a dollar. He’s ruthless, he’s deplorable, he doesn’t know how to love anybody.”

Trump is right that King has “beaten the system.” He succeeded in getting the second-degree murder conviction reduced and obtaining a pardon. King  also beat two federal indictments. In 1988, he was found not guilty on fraud charges, and in 1985, King was found not guilty of tax evasion charges. King’s lawyers admitted that the promoter had failed to report income, but they blamed it on accounting errors and King’s lack of understanding of the system. The prosecutor in that case was fellow Trump supporter Rudy Giuliani.

So how could someone with all this baggage wind up being touted by a GOP presidential nominee as a reference? Maybe King’s catchphrase is the best explanation: “Only in America!”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate