Trump’s Lawyers Had a Very Good Summer

Why is he paying them so much money?

Gerald Herbert/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Donald Trump didn’t spend a cent on television ads until last week, and he paid the woman who wrote his wife’s convention speech an oddly small fee, but one campaign expense he couldn’t seem to control last month was his legal bills.

In July alone, the Trump campaign’s latest campaign finance filings show, it spent more than $762,000 on legal fees—more than it spent on anything else but travel, merchandise, and his fundraising efforts. By comparison, Hillary Clinton’s campaign spent $105,000 on legal expenses in July.

The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment on why Trump is spending so much on lawyers. Most of the money is being paid to the Washington, DC, powerhouse firm Jones Day, where the campaign’s top lawyer, Don McGahn, a former member of the Federal Election Commission, is a partner.

The Trump campaign has had only a handful of legal issues—that are publicly known, at least—but it seems unlikely that they would have generated such large legal fees. One that did break in July was a brief squabble with former Trump aide Sam Nunberg, whom the campaign sued for $10 million in early July. The campaign alleged that Nunberg had violated a nondisclosure agreement he signed when he was hired, accusing him of orchestrating a leak of details of internal campaign strife. The dispute was settled earlier this month.

According to the filings the campaign made, it paid just over $78,000 to two lawyers and an arbitration company in New York City, where the Nunberg lawsuit was filed. But Trump has other ties to those law firms. One firm, Kasowitz, Benson, Torress & Friedman, which the campaign paid $69,000 in July, has long represented Trump’s real estate interests and handled a defamation suit Trump filed in 2005 against a journalist who questioned his wealth. (The journalist won.) In April, a partner at the firm, David Friedman, was named an “Israel advisor” to the Trump campaign. The other New York firm, Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, which was paid almost $2,400, has represented Trump’s company in its ongoing litigation involving Trump University.

Locke Lord LLP, a Chicago law firm, received $26,000 from the campaign. It’s a large international firm, but according to the website of the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign finance data, Locke Lord hasn’t been hired by any other political campaigns this election.

Whatever the reason for the campaign’s lavish on lawyers, the flurry of legal bills is striking in the context of Trump’s overall spending when compared with other recent campaigns. The Trump campaign has spent a total of $89.5 million. Of that, $1.1 million has gone toward legal fees. That’s how much the Mitt Romney presidential campaign spent on legal fees over the course of the entire 2012 election, while spending $483 million overall on Romney’s losing bid.

While the Clinton campaign has still spent more than the Trump effort on lawyers this election—$1.4 million in total—it has also been up and running for five months longer. Trump’s $1.1 million spent on lawyers is just $300,000 shy of Clinton’s. And as Trump himself has gleefully pointed out, the Clinton campaign has faced more than its share of legal issues. Maybe Trump can explain whether he’s got legal issues of his own that have caused the bills to pile up.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate