Life Expectancy in Syria Has Taken a Major Hit

A new study finds that war and instability are a serious threat to health in Middle Eastern countries.

A man injured in a Saudi-led airstrike lies on a hospital bed in Sanaa, Yemen.Hani Mohammed/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It wasn’t that long ago that Syrians were enjoying a steady increase in life expectancy—about a three-month bump every single year for more than two decades. Same for the residents of Yemen, Libya, and Egypt, who saw improvements in life expectancy and an array of other health indicators from 1990 until the Arab Spring uprisings began spreading in late 2010.

“Keep in mind that this region has not been stable for a long time, has had a lot of unrest, and against all odds we had seen an improvement in health,” says Ali Mokdad, a professor at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington in Seattle. But those slow gains have been all but erased. “Immediately after the uprisings,” he says, “we see a rapid decline of all the health indicators, in a short time wiping out a lot of progress that has been made.”

Mokdad is the lead author of a new study published yesterday in The Lancet Global Health that analyzes health problems and mortality in 22 countries across the Middle East, North Africa, and Central Asia from 1990 to 2013. Its findings are stark: The recent uprisings in Libya, Iraq, Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, and Syria have caused a drop in life expectancy in those countries, with Syria suffering the most. Between 2010 and 2013, Syria’s life expectancy for men fell from 75 years to 69 years; for women, it dropped from 80 years to about 75 years. Other countries suffering from conflict and insecurity lost about three months of life expectancy. That’s a dramatic decrease considering that they previously had been on track to keep improving, and the life expectancy in their more stable neighbors rose during the same period.

Between 2010 and 2013, the life expectancy for Syrian men fell from 75 years to 69 years.

It’s not just bombs and bullets causing severe, long-term health impacts in these countries. Diseases that had been all but eradicated have returned. Infant mortality rates are on the rise in Syria. Health care infrastructure is being wiped out, leaving the ill and injured without access to basic care that would otherwise save their lives. In both Yemen and Syria, where medical facilities have been targeted in bombing campaigns, preventable illnesses and diseases are claiming an alarming number of lives.

Deaths from diabetes rose from 12 to 19 per 100,000 people across the Eastern Mediterranean region over the two decades reviewed. Malnutrition, the lack of clean water, and poor sanitation have contributed to the spread of infectious diseases like Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and tuberculosis. Mokdad says that in countries like Syria, which has now effectively “lost all of its protective mechanisms,” people are dying at a higher number from “diseases that have never killed them before. Some of our young physicians haven’t even seen some of these illnesses,” he notes.

In war zones, women of childbearing age and children under five are often the hardest hit. “Their reserves are depleted,” says Mokdad, and they fall into “a vicious cycle” of dehydration, malnutrition, illness, and often ultimately death. Children younger than five contributed to a third of all health losses—that is, people living with a disability or illness—in 2013, the report notes.

There is one kernel of optimism in the study: Among the region’s 22 nations as a whole, life expectancy was on the rise—at least until 2013, when the data stops. Since then, as Mokdad explains, “The war has intensified in Syria. There is a bloody war in Yemen. There is a bloody war in Libya. There is still unrest in Egypt and Tunisia. We are underestimating the burden on people and the suffering of the region.”

Riyadh Lafta, the paper’s comment author and an epidemiologist and professor at the Mustansiriya Medical School in Baghdad, said in an email, “It is a bit confusing how life expectancy improved with all this mess of sectarian wars, terrorism, bombing, and deterioration of health services and infrastructure! I think that the reason behind this is that some of the included ‘stable’ countries might change the picture by diluting the effect of wars and violence on the morbidity, mortality, and disability rates.”

Lafta then offered a prediction for the future. He said simply, “The situation will get worse.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate