If You Want Time Off When You Have a Baby, Don’t Live in These States

The US still doesn’t take paid family leave seriously.

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/g/Halfpoint">Halfpoint</a>/Shutterstock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In the United States, 23 percent of new mothers are back in the office within two weeks of childbirth, not because they want to but because the United States has no comprehensive policy for paid family leave.

Instead, family leave is determined by individual states, and a new report by the National Partnership for Women & Families, an advocacy group that promotes “fairness in the workplace,” paints a grim picture of the patchwork of policies across the country. It graded individual states on their family leave policies and 27 scored a D or an F. According to Vicki Shabo, vice president at National Partnership, these states “have done very little or nothing at all beyond the very basic protections federal law offers when it comes to providing leave, providing pregnancy accommodations or helping nursing mothers in the workplace.” 

The report was created by using a point system to tally up which states have the most progressive policies for both workers in the private sector and state workers. States received points for laws that accommodate working pregnant women or breastfeeding women, flexible sick leave, and job-protected paid family leave.

“No state is really doing enough to help working parents and provide the baseline of support that working parents need,” Shabo says. “Particularly at a time when the issues of working families and how to create a sustainable, equitable economy and society are really front and center.”

The report notes that the United States is the only economically advanced nation that fails to guarantee maternity leave—paid or unpaid. According to the International Labor Organization, 183 countries guarantee paid maternity leave and 79 guarantee paid paternity leave.

There are a few bright spots. California received the highest score for the first-of-its-kind paid family leave law, which allows people earning close to minimum wage to be paid 70 percent of their salary while on leave, while workers who earn up to $108,000 annually will get 60 percent of their salary during leave. Another law on the books mandates no less than one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked. But the authors of the report added that even California has room for improvement; there’s no law protecting job security in the case of necessary leave. New York, which guarantees 12 weeks of paid leave, and the District of Columbia, where workers can take up to 16 weeks of leave over two years, scored the second highest with an A-.

But these are the exceptions; 12 states scored an F, meaning lawmakers enacted no laws guaranteeing any maternal or family leave before or after a new child is born, adopted, or fostered.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The report also points out the disparity between white families and people of color when it comes to family leave. Under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, a law that protects jobs if leave is necessary, only 59 percent of the total workforce—and 56 percent of the private-sector workforce—are covered. The report explains, “In the private sector, workers are excluded because the FMLA only applies to employees in workplaces with 50 or more workers within a 75-mile radius. Even in covered workplaces, workers must have worked for their employer for at least a year and worked at least 1,250 hours during the previous year to be eligible.” The data also showed that only 25 percent of Hispanic working parents and 35 percent of African American working parents are eligible and can afford to take that leave, compared with 43 percent of working white parents.

The report also documents strong bipartisan support for increased paid family leave policies. Research showed that 96 percent of Democrats, 74 percent of independents, and 73 percent of Republicans polled identified implementing new laws for paid sick days and paid family and medical leave as “very important.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate