What Donald Trump and Dr. Oz Have in Common

They’ve both peddled some questionable dietary supplements.

Jeff Malet/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When Donald Trump swings by Dr. Mehmet Oz’s TV studio in New York on Wednesday to tape an episode about the Republican presidential candidate’s health that is scheduled to air Thursday, the two should find a lot of common ground. Beyond their status as reality TV stars, they share a history of peddling questionable nutritional supplements.

Dr. Oz—who by most accounts is a skilled cardiothoracic surgeon when he’s actually practicing medicine—has used his show to promote dubious medical advice and products. “Much of the advice Oz offers is sensible, and is rooted solidly in scientific literature,” the New Yorker‘s Michael Specter wrote in a 2013 profile of Oz. “That is why the rest of what he does is so hard to understand. Oz is an experienced surgeon, yet almost daily he employs words that serious scientists shun, like ‘startling,’ ‘breakthrough,’ ‘radical,’ ‘revolutionary,’ and ‘miracle.’ There are miracle drinks and miracle meal plans and miracles to stop aging and miracles to fight fat.”

In 2014, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) ripped into Oz at a congressional hearing, accusing him of hyping unproven weight-loss supplements as cure-alls. “The scientific community is almost monolithic against you in terms of the efficacy of the three products that you called ‘miracles,'” McCaskill said. “When you call a product a miracle, and it’s something you can buy, and it’s something that gives people false hope, I just don’t understand why you needed to go there.” Oz defended himself at the hearing by pointing out that he does not officially endorse these products or market them outside of his show. “I recognize that oftentimes they don’t have the scientific muster to present as fact,” he said, “but nevertheless I would give my audience the advice I give my family all the time, and I have given my family these products.”

Trump is no stranger to dubious health schemes. One of his many branding business ventures was the Trump Network, a multi-level marketing company that promised consumers a customized regimen of dietary supplements. As reported in an investigation by STAT‘s Ike Swetlitz, Trump licensed his name and family crest in 2009 to an existing set of products from a company named Ideal Health. The marquee item on sale was a home urine test that customers could ship to the Trump Network in order to receive a set of vitamins supposedly tailored to their needs. Except as STAT noted in its investigation, there was no science behind it or peer-reviewed evidence to back up its claims. (The products didn’t require Food and Drug Administration approval.) These packages weren’t cheap either. The initial test and first month’s supply ran $139.95, with subsequent months costing $69.95.

Trump didn’t own the company, but he lent his full endorsement to the business. In March 2011, he tweeted that the Trump Network’s products could help people lead “better lives.”

He even cut a video touting the genius of the Trump Network—though it was mostly a jumble of vague, meaningless business-speak about how you could make a bunch of money selling the products rather than an endorsement of the vitamins from a health standpoint. “Americans need a new plan, they need a new dream,” he said. “The Trump Network wants to give millions of people renewed hope and with an exciting plan to opt out of the recession.”

Update: The episode was initially billed as a big reveal of Trump’s full medical records, but on Wednesday the Trump campaign said that Oz won’t be getting a hold of Trump’s medical records ahead of the taping and that Trump won’t be revealing his records on the show. According to CNN, Trump and Oz will just be discussing Trump’s “physical activity, dietary habits, and broader health-related issues.”

Update 2: It looks like Trump changed his mind. In a clip released by the show Wednesday afternoon, Trump pulled out the papers documenting his most recent physical, and handed the records over to Oz. While a few details have leaked thanks to members of the show’s studio audience, we’ll have to wait until the episode airs Thursday to learn just how detailed Trump went in revealing his health history.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate