Trump Overlooked One Small Detail When He Invited Obama’s Half Brother to the Debate

Right-wing conspiracy theorists used to think Malik Obama was linked to Muslim terrorists.


Malik Obama

Malik Obama holds a photo of Barack Obama, himself, and a friend in his shop in Siaya, eastern Kenya, in 2004. Karel Prinsloo/AP

Donald Trump has spent years demonizing Muslims and warning that radical Islam is threatening the very core of our nation. He’s alluded to rumors of sinister links to the Muslim Brotherhood in the highest ranks of the Obama administration, namely in the form of Hillary Clinton adviser Huma Abedin. Many Trump supporters have been public proponents of the view that the Obama White House has been infiltrated by the Muslim Brotherhood, including Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), former Rep. Allen West (R-Fla.), and Joe Miller, who’s running for the Senate in Alaska. This week, one of Trump’s advisers even blamed the real estate mogul’s falling poll numbers on a global propaganda conspiracy launched by the Muslim Brotherhood.

Which makes it all the more strange that Trump would decide to bring President Barack Obama’s Muslim half brother Malik to Wednesday night’s debate. The conspiracy-minded right-wing press has long held up Malik Obama as proof-positive of the president’s secret Muslim terrorist ties. World Net Daily writer Jerome Corsi, one of the most prominent of the birther conspiracy theorists and a longtime Trump fan, has been covering Malik Obama for years and implying that he has undue influence on his brother in the White House. In 2013, Corsi reported on allegations that Malik was overseeing investments for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and suggested that this financial relationship helped explain why the Obama administration was supposedly supporting the organization. Corsi later claimed that Malik, who built a mosque on the Obama family compound in Kenya, could soon be added to Egypt’s terrorist watch list because of his ties to the Brotherhood. (Malik has vigorously denied the allegations of links to the Muslim Brotherhood.)

But in 2015, the tone of WND‘s coverage shifted. What changed? Malik turned on his famous half brother in the film Dreams From My Real Father, a docudrama by Joel Gilbert that claimed Barack Obama’s real father was a Communist named Frank Marshall Davis. In the film, Malik—a man who sold letters from his famous brother—said the president is “not an honest man.” Later Gilbert claimed he’d gotten a draft manuscript from Malik; according to a WND story, the manuscript helped bolster the theory that former Weatherman Bill Ayers had helped write Barack Obama’s best-selling memoir, Dreams From My Father. In July, Malik announced his support for Trump, telling the New York Post, “I like Donald Trump because he speaks from the heart. Make America Great Again is a great slogan. I would like to meet him.”

Walid Shoebat, a vocal foe of Islam who claims to have converted to Christianity after engaging in jihad for the Palestinian Liberation Organization (a claim widely disputed), was the source for much of Corsi’s reporting on Malik’s supposed Islamic terrorism ties. After learning that Trump had invited Malik to the debate Wednesday, Shoebat was apoplectic. Writing on his website, he expressed bafflement over the Trump campaign’s decision. He wrapped up by saying, “P.S.: Malik, the bottom line is that you are a rotten egg. You live like one, you lie like one, because you are one rotten lying egg. Enjoy your moment of fame with Trump for tomorrow you will be tossed like a filthy rag.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate