Obama Sees “Straight Line” From Sarah Palin to Donald Trump

The president explains the origins of Trump’s GOP takeover.

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


President Barack Obama said the beginnings of Donald Trump’s unlikely rise to power can be found in the Republican Party’s embrace of Sarah Palin in 2008 when the former Alaskan governor ran for vice president, according to an interview with New York Magazine published Monday.

“I see a straight line from the announcement of Sarah Palin as the vice presidential nominee to what we see today in Donald Trump, the emergence of the Freedom Caucus, the tea party, and the shift in the center of gravity for the Republican Party,” Obama said in the wide-ranging interview with New York‘s Jonathan Chait. “Whether that changes, I think, will depend in part on the outcome of this election, but it’s also going to depend on the degree of self-reflection inside the Republican Party.”

Obama thought that there were several pivotal moments during the 2016 campaign that would break the “fever” currently ravaging through the GOP but, much to his consternation, the situation seems to have only gotten worse. Obama’s revealing answer is likely to be seen as a dig at Sen. John McCain, who chose Palin as his running mate in 2008.

In July, Trump implied that the Arizona senator was not a true war hero because he was captured during the Vietnam War. “I like people who weren’t captured, okay?” Trump said. Nonetheless the five-term Arizona senator, who is currently facing a tough reelection bid, endorsed the GOP nominee.

For more on how Republican pandering to Palin-style politics begat Trump’s hostile takeover of the party, head to our deep dive here.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate